Feds Launch Criminal Probe Into BP Spill

Photo <a href="http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=9033571&contentId=7061902">© BP p.l.c.</a>.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Also: James Ridgeway writes about the oil industry’s slimy history—and why no oil exec has ever gone to jail for environmental devastation.

The Department of Justice announced Tuesday that it is conducting a criminal probe into the explosion, and that the federal government is weighing both criminal and civil penalties for the disaster. The administration, Holder said, wants to “make sure the American people don’t foot the bill for this” and will be “meticulous, comprehensive and aggressive” in doing so.

“We have begun both a criminal as well as a civil investigation as is our obligation under the law,” Holder told reporters following a meeting with state and federal prosecutors in New Orleans. “Our environmental laws are very clear.”

He also said that the government will be “forceful” in its response if “evidence of illegal behavior is found. He added, however, that they believe there is “sufficient basis” to begin a criminal probe. In the past days, more evidence has come to light that BP ignored warning signs at the well and cut corners.

There are a variety of laws at their disposal in coming after BP: The Clean Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act, and the Endangered Species Act. As I reported earlier, the company could already face up to $4.6 billion in civil penalties for Clean Water Act violations alone. Senators have also asked the DOJ to look into whether the company made false claims about its ability to respond to a disaster.

Last week, Ronald Weich, an assistant attorney general, informed senators that the DOJ has issued formal demands to BP, Transocean and other companies to “ensure the preservation of potentially relevant information.” The demands also outlined the “legal requirements for preserving evidence in anticipation of litigation,” Weich wrote.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate