White Officer Involved in Fatal California Shooting Was Once Charged With an Off-Duty Hate Crime

The victim’s family seeks answers from the Barstow Police Department.

Relatives of Diante Yarber appear with their attorney at a press conference on April 23, 2018.James Quigg

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

One of the officers involved in the April 5 shooting death of an unarmed black man in a Walmart parking lot in Barstow, California, was previously charged with an off-duty hate crime, fired from the police force, and later reinstated, according to information from news reports, police statements, and claims by an attorney for the family of the 26-year-old shooting victim, Diante Yarber.

In the earlier incident, a white Barstow officer named Jimmy Alfred Walker, then 30, was charged with one misdemeanor count of violating a man’s civil rights, two counts of battery, and one count of disturbing the peace following an August 2010 off-duty fracas in which Walker allegedly assaulted a man and a woman outside a bar, the Los Angeles Times reported: “After deputies arrived and in their presence, he then allegedly directed racial epithets toward the man.” The race of the victims was unavailable at the time, the Times noted, but Walker was charged under a hate crime statute that makes it illegal to use force against another person because of their race or other immutable characteristics.

A local news website, the San Bernadino County Sentinel, reported that Walker was fired in 2013 “as a delayed consequence of an August 2010 incident” and that he had ultimately pleaded guilty to lesser charges of fighting in public and public intoxication, and had received probation. The Sentinel, which added that the allegedly assaulted couple were African American, also reported that Walker eventually filed a successful motion to have all charges dismissed and that an administrative judge, in an arbitration hearing, determined that Walker’s conduct, being off-duty and outside Barstow, did not warrant losing his badge—Walker was reinstated with two years’ back pay. (Attempts to reach Officer Walker were unsuccessful.)

The Yarber family’s attorney, Lee Merritt held a press conference last week saying his sources had identified one of the officers who responded to the fatal call as Jimmy (or Jimmie) Alfred Walker. On Monday, the Barstow Police Department finally confirmed Walker’s involvement but said state law prevented the release of any details from his personnel file. The other officers on the scene were Jose Barrientos, Vincent Carrillo, and Mathew Helms, the department said. According to news reports, Merritt cited witness accounts saying one of the officers had shouted a racial slur—”(Expletive) we’re gonna kill you”—at Yarber and his passengers. The police department did not comment on that claim.

Yarber was killed early last month after police fired 30 shots at his car, which had at least two passengers inside. Officers had responded to a call about a “suspicious” vehicle parked in a Walmart lot. According to reports, the license plate number given to the police indicated that the car was registered to Yarber, whom police suspected of involvement in a stolen-car incident the month before. When they tried to detain him, police said, Yarber twice put the car in reverse and backed toward the officers, striking two cruisers. A cellphone video of part of the incident shows Yarber’s car backing out of a parking space, apparently trying to get away, as officers appear to fire on the vehicle.

An independent autopsy commissioned by Yarber’s family determined that he was struck 10 times. His cause of death was asphyxiation—he choked on his own blood, Merritt told reporters, and his life might have been saved had officers rendered prompt medical attention. The family intends to sue the city, he said.

An August 2017 investigation by the Washington Post found that of nearly 1,900 officers fired from major police departments for misconduct since 2006, nearly a quarter of them got their jobs back after going through arbitration. “It’s demoralizing, but not just to the chief,” former Philadelphia police chief Charles Ramsey told the newspaper. “It’s demoralizing to the rank and file who really don’t want to have those kinds of people in their ranks.”

“It causes a tremendous amount of anxiety in the public,” he added. “Our credibility is shot whenever these things happen.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate