The Supreme Court Just Gave the Trump Administration the Green Light to Execute People

The first federal executions in nearly 20 years will happen this summer.

Oliver Contreras/Zuma

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

On Monday, the US Supreme Court declined to take up the case of federal death row prisoners who had challenged the government’s lethal injection protocol, paving the way for the Trump administration to carry out the first executions at the federal level in nearly two decades.

The high court’s denial means that the government can proceed with four executions starting next month. Daniel Lee, who was sentenced to death for the 1996 murders of William Mueller, his wife Nancy and daughter Sarah, will be executed on July 13. Wesley Purkey and Daniel Honken will be put to death on July 15 and July 17, and Keith Nelson will be executed on August 28. The men, who are currently housed in the high-security federal prison in Terre Haute, Indiana, have been on death row between 16 and 22 years. The US government plans to use a single dose of pentobarbital to put the inmates to death. 

“Even as people across the country are demanding that leaders rethink crime, punishment, and justice, the government is barreling ahead with its plans to carry out the first federal executions in 17 years,” said Ruth Friedman, the attorney for Daniel Lee and the director of the Federal Capital Habeas Project, an organization of lawyers that specialize in federal death row inmates. “Given the unfairness built into the federal death penalty system and the many unanswered questions about both the cases of the men scheduled to die, and the government’s new execution protocol, there must be appropriate court review before the government can proceed with any execution.”

Donald Trump has long been a fan of the death penalty and has been trying to revive the capital punishment system at the highest levels of government since 2019. Last July, the Department of Justice announced that Lee, Honken, and Purkey, as well as Lezmond Mitchell and Alfred Bourgeois would be executed in December 2019 and January 2020. The executions have been delayed by legal challenges since then.

In November, a federal judge halted four of the executions in order to allow the inmates to challenge the US government’s lethal injection protocol. The fifth inmate, Mitchell, the only Native American on federal death row, had his execution halted by a US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judge in order to allow the courts to review racial bias on the jury that sentenced him to death. In March, a federal judge granted Bourgeois a temporary stay after he successfully filed an intellectual disability claim. “A pervasive myth is that the federal death penalty is ‘the gold standard’ of capital punishment systems,” Friedman said in a statement. “The federal death penalty is arbitrary, racially-biased, and rife with poor lawyering and junk science.”

But, while the cases were making their way through the courts, Attorney General William Barr announced on June 16, that execution dates had been set for Lee, Purkey, Honken, and Keith Nelson. Barr, like many other conservatives and death penalty supporters said that the executions will bring justice to the families of the victims.  Even before the Supreme Court’s announcement today, earlier this month, Attorney General William Barr released a statement echoing many other conservatives and death penalty supporters, saying that the executions will bring justice to the families of the victims. “The four murderers whose executions are scheduled today have received full and fair proceedings under our Constitution and laws. We owe it to the victims of these horrific crimes, and to the families left behind, to carry forward the sentence imposed by our justice system.”

But not all victims agree. Earlene Peterson, Nancy Mueller’s mother, and an ardent Trump supporter has been asking the government to call off the execution of Lee since last year. As I reported, Peterson made a six-minute video describing her reasons for opposition:

“The government ain’t doing this for me,” she said in the video. After showing pictures of Nancy and her granddaughter to the camera, Peterson sits outside of her home and recounts the story of the crime that robbed her of a daughter, son-in-law, and grandchild. “I believe you have to pay for what you do,” she said. “But that doesn’t mean death.”

Peterson is far from an outlier. In recent years, several states have completely abolished the death penalty and public polling shows that support for capital punishment has been rapidly declining. 

Only 62 inmates are now being held on federal death row and just three people have been executed by the federal government since 1988. But if the Department of Justice is successful, that number will more than double by the end of summer. It’s notable that the Trump administration is pushing to carry out these executions in the midst of several crises. The coronavirus has killed at least 124,000 people in the United States while disproportionately affecting communities of color. Since the end of May, a national racial reckoning sparked by the death of George Floyd, a Black man, at the hands of a white police officer has led to a massive public shift in how people perceive race and the criminal justice system.

A vast majority of Americans now thinks the country needs to do a lot more to address the racial injustices embedded in the system. An AP-NORC poll found that 69 percent of Americans think the criminal justice system needs either major changes or a complete overhaul. But the Trump administration seems determined to appeal to the shrinking minority of potential voters by positioning himself as the “law and order” candidate rather than a healer or uniter. And nothing sends a clearer signal of that priority than resuming federal executions four months before the election.

DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST...

without free and fair elections, a vigorous free press, and engaged citizens to reclaim power from those who abuse it.

In this election year unlike any other—against a backdrop of a pandemic, an economic crisis, racial reckoning, and so much daily crazy—Mother Jones' journalism is driven by one simple question: Will America will move closer to, or further from, justice and equity in the years to come?

If you're able to, please join us in this mission with a donation today. Our reporting right now is focused on voting rights and election security, corruption, disinformation, racial and gender equity, and the climate crisis. We can’t do it without the support of readers like you, and we need to give it everything we've got between now and November. Thank you.

DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST...

without free and fair elections, a vigorous free press, and engaged citizens to reclaim power from those who abuse it.

In this election year unlike any other—against a backdrop of a pandemic, an economic crisis, racial reckoning, and so much daily crazy—Mother Jones' journalism is driven by one simple question: Will America will move closer to, or further from, justice and equity in the years to come?

If you're able to, please join us in this mission with a donation today. Our reporting right now is focused on voting rights and election security, corruption, disinformation, racial and gender equity, and the climate crisis. We can’t do it without the support of readers like you, and we need to give it everything we've got between now and November. Thank you.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate