Flushing Your Contacts Does Terrible Things to Our Land and Oceans

The US sends an estimated 44,000 pounds of contact lenses down the drain every year. Yikes.

lolostock/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

For a lot of people, contact lenses are a daily necessity. Market research shows 45 million Americans, about one in eight, wear contacts, meaning the United States alone consumes somewhere between five and 14 billion lenses annually. And now, new research shows all those contact lenses may end up as micro-plastic pollution in our soil, rivers, and oceans.

An estimated 20 percent of contact-lens wearers, studied as part of a 400-person online survey, flush their lenses down the sink or toilet, as opposed to placing them in the trash as industry experts recommend. That amounts to 20 metric tons of plastic, or 20,000 kilograms (about 44,000 pounds), flushed per year—about the weight of a small airplane. The biggest culprit? Daily-use lenses, which occupy about 40 percent of the market. 

The new research, which was presented Sunday at the 256th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society, adds to growing concern about all kinds of plastics and micro-plastics—those less than five millimeters in diameter—that have plagued our land and waterways for decades. Every year, an estimated 19 billion pounds of plastic ends up in the ocean, and that amount is expected to double by 2025. These plastics litter coral reefs, are ingested by sea creatures and birds, and can even make their way into the fish we eat

“We wondered: How many lenses are there in the US?,” Rolf Halden, a professor in the Ira A. Fulton School for Sustainable Engineering at Arizona State University and a lead researcher on the analysis, tells Mother Jones. “And then, what happens to them if a fraction of them find their way into wastewater treatment plants?” 

To find out, Halden’s team conducted an online survey to assess contact-user behavior, including how many people normally flush their lenses, and also visited a wastewater treatment plant in the United States as a model of what to expect across the country. They discovered the majority of lens plastic treated at wastewater plants doesn’t degrade and is likely becoming part of “municipal sewage sludge.” Nation-wide, about half of that sludge is sent to landfills, according to Halden. But the other half, he says, is applied as fertilizer to land. “This amounts to at least 11 thousand kilograms per year of contact lens material applied on American soils,” he says.

Contact lenses recovered from treated sewage sludge

Charles Rolsky

From land, the contact lenses can be ingested by insects and birds or enter waterways as rainwater runoff. “It’s safe to say that some lenses might make it into the surface water,” that is, water that will run into the ocean, says Halden. “We just believe that fraction, under normal conditions is very small, probably less than 1 percent.” 

So, by mass, contact lenses are “not a big player” in ocean pollution when compared to other forms of plastic, like plastic bags and packaging, he says. For example, contact lens packaging alone requires somewhere between seven and 15 million kilograms of plastic annually, most of which isn’t recyclable. “That’s equivalent to the amount of polypropylene it would take to make 400 million toothbrushes,” he says.

But, even a small amount can have an impact and what’s crucial about recognizing this kind of pollution is that, according to Halden, there’s an easy fix: Simply stop flushing those contacts.

“Here’s the bottom line: Put those lenses, if you use them, into the solid waste stream, meaning in your garbage can, and encourage the manufacturers of contact lenses to provide recycling opportunities.” 

Halden and his team expect their research to be published in an academic journal in the coming months.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate