The White House Denied Me Access to Trump’s Environmental Speech

“NOT Confirmed to Attend the Remarks on America’s Environmental Leadership.”

Al Drago/Pool/CNP via ZUMA

President Donald Trump will be delivering a speech on America’s environmental leadership on Monday afternoon, alongside EPA administrator Andrew Wheeler, in which he’s expected to tout how much he’s done for clean air and clean water. It’s an unusual subject for him to give a speech about—Axios called it a “Javanka Special”—given the many regulations his administration has ripped up in favor of industry lobbyists. His many environmental opponents have already pointed out how short the list of his environmental accomplishments really is.  

Naturally, as an environmental reporter who works a few blocks from the White House, I requested press credentials to cover his speech. After a few days of silence, I received a generic email from the White House Press Office yesterday at 6:40 p.m. The subject line announced, “NOT Confirmed to Attend the Remarks on America’s Environmental Leadership,” a statement repeated in red letters at the top of the email. “Unfortunately, due to high interest and space constraints we cannot confirm you for tomorrow’s event and you are not credentialed to attend.”  I asked for additional comment but have not yet received the response. 

I have covered the Trump administration’s environmental record closely from the beginning. Just like when I covered the Obama administration, sometimes my reporting proved embarrassing for the EPA. And the Trump administration has certainly demonstrated a pattern in how it handles press. 

In some ways, I suppose my getting shut out is not surprising, given that Mother Jones has been tough and critical in its coverage of the Trump administration. That’s our job. 

But one strategy of Trump’s lengthy history in attacking the press—alongside briefly revoking a White House reporter’s press passes and repeatedly demonizing journalists and the publications we work for—has been to simply deny entry.

My colleague Pema Levy wrote about Trump’s informal blacklist during the 2016 campaign. “It seems that once Trump and his team have decided someone is not on the list, their word is just about final,” she observed.

The official and now familiar reason the Trump campaign gave to Pema was that the event was “well over capacity,” even while letting other journalists enter. Several Mother Jones reporters were barred from covering his campaign events in early 2016, joining quite a long and distinguished list of reporters and outlets the campaign seemed to deem unfriendly—including HuffPost, Politico, BuzzFeed, National Review, the New York Times. Trump admitted to the media black list in June 2016, when he posted on Facebook he’d revoke the press credentials of the “phony and dishonest” Washington Post.

This approach extends to the government agencies that have traditionally been covered by journalists. His political appointees have followed his lead by sometimes shutting out the beat reporters from covering federal agencies. The EPA has done this repeatedly with environmental reporters, admitting to removing a Washington Post reporter from its press lists—which I mysteriously disappeared from as well—and physically ejecting an AP reporter who was covering a conference devoted to discussing water-polluting chemicals known as PFAS.

I will still cover Trump’s speech—and factcheck it—anyway.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate