Did California Just Do More to Reduce Emissions Than the New Climate Bill?

Cars are just one piece of the puzzle. But this is still a massive step.

Imagine this—sans emissions.Brandon Sloter/Image of Sport/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The movement to electrify the nation’s automotive fleet took a huge step forward this week when a group of California air regulators voted to ban gas-powered cars by 2035. 

California, the nation’s largest auto market, plans to require that all new cars sold in the state be emissions-free by 2035. Currently, about 16 percent of new cars sold in the state are electric. California will have to boost that number to 35 percent by 2026, and to 68 percent by 2030. And at least a dozen other states are expected to follow suit.

“That regulation is ambitious, and is on par with what is necessary to encourage rapid transition of the economy towards cars that are electrified,” Yonah Freemark, a senior research associate in the Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center at the Urban Institute, told me.

California’s announcement, in concert with the recently passed Inflation Reduction Act, signals a major milestone in the goal of slashing emissions by 2030 to stave off uncontrollable global heating. While the IRA is projected to dramatically reduce emissions, some analyses show that a very small percentage of that reduction would come from the transportation sector, which accounts for the largest share of the United States’ emissions. It would be impossible to measure the individual effects of each climate regulation, but Freemark called the electrification of California’s cars “the most influential change.”

For decades—except under Trump—historically smoggy California has enjoyed a waiver under the Clean Air Act allowing it to set stricter emissions standards than the federal government. More than a dozen states that have followed California’s lead in the past are likely to institute their own gas-free car requirements. But there are still legal hurdles to overcome: 17 Republican attorneys general have sued to revoke California’s waiver and defang the new regulation.

Even if it succeeds, California’s switch to electric will not be a panacea for the nation’s transit woes. Gas-guzzling cars will remain on the roads until they’re phased out like the horse and buggy. The rule does nothing to address the nation’s traffic safety crisis or to facilitate the transportation of masses of people from point A to point B without unwieldy vehicles whose production requires destructive mining. But, hey, it’s a start. Beep, beep: electric vehicles coming to dominate your dangerously car-reliant society.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate