On Partisan Rhetoric and Fainting Couches

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

After listening to the delicate flowers in the GOP whine for the past week about how brutally partisan President Obama’s deficit speech was, I thought I should remind them of some of the things Paul Ryan said in his budget plan. Here’s a taste of what Obama was responding to:

Where the President has failed, House Republicans will lead….[The president’s budget] Locks in reckless spending spree….Never reaches primary balance — failing to clear even the low bar the administration set for itself.

….The President and his party’s leaders embarked on a stimulus spending spree that added hundreds of billions of dollars to the debt, yet failed to deliver on its promises to create jobs. Acute economic hardship was exploited to enact unprecedented expansions of government power.

….Since his inauguration, the President has promoted a heavy-handed compliance culture in the energy sector, brimming with regulations and reckless spending on government-appointed winners and losers…. Gas prices have more than doubled since the President took of?ce. Burdensome and ineffective regulations on businesses in the service of dubious environmental goals have driven up the prices of many products and services, while creating barriers for needed capital investment and job creation.

….The insistence by the President and his party’s leaders on spending money the government does not have has yielded trillion-dollar de?cits now and into the future….By failing to address the unsustainable growth of autopilot spending programs, the President’s budget commits this nation to a crushing burden of debt.

I’ll forego my fainting couch for the moment. I’m pretty sure I can handle this kind of rhetoric. But somebody needs to remind Republicans that tough partisan talk wasn’t exactly invented last Wednesday by President Obama’s speechwriters.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate