The Wall Street Journal reports today on the big-company CEOs who made the most money in 2018. The big winner is David Zaslav, CEO of Discovery, whose TV channels are apparently doing pretty well. He raked in $129.4 million last year. The highest paid woman was Mary Barra of General Motors, who earned $21.9 million. This puts her in about 40th place.

Anyway, this seems like a good excuse to revisit CEO pay. Based on the Journal’s data, here it is from 2010 through 2018:

Adjusted for inflation, median CEO pay has increased by 21 percent since 2010. In other words, it’s pretty much tracked the growth in GDP. That might seem fair, but for some reason it doesn’t apply to the rest of us. Blue-collar workers have seen a pay increase of only 3.5 percent over the same period.

You might wonder why corporations are so willing to pay their CEOs big money for doing nothing but coasting along on an expanding economy, and you’d be right to wonder that. I’ve long thought that big-company CEO pay should be tightly tied to economic growth or something similar. If your company grows faster than the economy, then fine: you get a healthy raise for doing a great job. But if your company just grows at the same rate as the economy, why do you deserve anything more than a COLA increase? The company probably would have done just as well without you.

This is, of course, just another way of looking at wage stagnation for those of us who aren’t big-company executives. We’re looking at a period of only eight years, so it doesn’t matter much what inflation measure you use or whether you include fringe benefits or any other details. You’ll get the same results either way: Eight years of a steadily expanding economy and steadily declining unemployment has produced only the tiniest of pay raises for ordinary workers. This is why you should laugh at anyone who says ominously that worker pay is “starting to show signs” of acceleration. I should damn well hope so. If it accelerates for another decade or so it might make up a fraction of the ground it’s lost over the past decade.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate