Clothing Arguments

For duds that don’t wear on the planet, the best bet is to buy used.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


  • Check out Other Hints For Greener Living

    Can the fashion-conscious have an ecoconscience? Designer Isaac Mizrahi would probably say yes, given that the dresses in his fall collection are accented with recycled furs. So would Giorgio Armani — he created the hemp tux Woody Harrelson wore to this year’s Oscars.

    But pose the question to environmental purists and they’ll tell you that, for the most part, the catwalk is a real dog when it comes to ecofriendliness, and if you truly want an outfit that matches your green sensibilities, buy used.

    Clothes manufacturing wears on the planet. Twenty-five percent of the insecticides used globally go on cotton plants, grown for the world’s most popular fabric. Synthetics, like polyester, are made from petroleum products and are nonbiodegradable. And fabric-finishing processes such as dyeing are highly toxic and polluting.

    So, if the creation of clothing has a negative impact on the environment, what then is behind all the green-labeled clothing on the market? Let’s take a look at the cloths many of these clothes are cut from:

    ORGANIC COTTON Organic cotton is grown using chemical-free, soil-enriching methods, but its use in manufacturing doesn’t guarantee ecofriendliness. Even companies, such as Patagonia, that exclusively use organic cotton still use color dyes. “Dyes are as bad, if not worse, than the agricultural chemicals,” says Sally Fox, an entomologist who grows colored organic cotton (above) for her company, Natural Cotton Colours Inc.

    Patagonia is well aware of this criticism, but responds that it’s promoting the first steps of change. “If no one buys the product,” explains Lu Setnicka of Patagonia, “you’re not going to build an organic cotton market.”

    HEMP Durable and versatile, hemp can be grown without chemicals and does not deplete soil. And consumers have been snapping up hemp fashions. However, industry experts say those hemp jeans you paid so much for may have been “greenwashed.” Since it’s illegal to grow hemp in the U.S., it’s imported, primarily from China, Hungary, Romania, and Russia — which aren’t exactly ecopioneers.

    According to Owen Sercus, a textile professor at New York’s Fashion Institute of Technology, hemp producers in these countries are using harsh chemicals to speed up the growing process. “If hemp is properly grown by nature,” he says, “it takes a long time.”

    TENCEL Tencel is a natural fiber created from wood pulp using a nontoxic, “closed loop” process that recycles solvents. Additionally, the pulp is only taken from trees grown on managed tree farms.

    Unfortunately, the EPA lists Courtaulds Fibers, the manufacturer of Tencel and other fiber products, as the sixth-largest polluter in the country, having released 34.5 million pounds of toxins into the environment in 1994. (Guess some things escaped “the loop.”)

    RECYCLED POLYESTER Fortrel EcoSpun is a polyester made from recycled plastic containers. Its manufacturer, Wellman Inc., says the production of EcoSpun saves 650,000 barrels of oil annually, while eliminating 375,000 tons of toxic air emissions. The material is made into jeans and Polar Fleece (which are, of course, dyed).

    Clearly, all fabrics have a downside. But remember, the fabrics and finishes are there because consumers want cheap, easy-to-care-for clothing. Oh, and we also want to express ourselves. “Do we want to end up like Maoist China, where everybody wore the same garment?” Sercus asks. “We in the fashion industry do what the consumer demands of us.”

    So, if you want your clothes to be green, demand it. If you want to know why a company has slapped an “ecolabel” on a garment, ask. And, if all else fails, there’s one surefire way to style yourself while minimizing environmental harm: Head to the secondhand store and grab that polyester leisure suit off the rack.

  • WE CAME UP SHORT.

    We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

    That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

    So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

    Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

    And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

    payment methods

    WE CAME UP SHORT.

    We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

    That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

    So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

    Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

    And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

    payment methods

    We Recommend

    Latest

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

    Get our award-winning magazine

    Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

    Subscribe

    Support our journalism

    Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

    Donate