Non-Exempt

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“Most countries are exempt.” This is simply not true. Under the U.S. proposals that are to be put forward in Kyoto, no countries will be exempted. Developing nations as well as the big industrial countries will have to begin cutting back on their CO2 emissions in order to deal with this global crisis. (On a practical level, advanced nations may have to provide technological know-how to developing countries so they can choose alternative energy paths rather then rely on carbon-rich coal and petroleum.)

The original idea of exempting the poorer countries, set forth at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, was based on the belief that the developed nations, being by far the gassiest, should act first to set an example. Unfortunately, the U.S. and other industrialized nations failed to meet their own “voluntary goals”: On Earth Day 1993 President Clinton pledged the U.S. would cut its greenhouse emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000, but in fact they’ve jumped 8 percent already.

Now the Clinton administration will go to Kyoto with a proposal to reduce global output to its 1990 level sometime between 2008 and 2012. This is seen as woefully inadequate by the European Union, Japan (whose proposals are also seen as weak, but not as weak as ours) and the Alliance of Small Island States, who face the loss of their very existence should sea levels rise as projected (Florida and New Orleans, take note). The fossil fuels industry, on the other hand, sees any kind of binding goal for CO2 reduction as unacceptable — although some of them have expressed thanks to Clinton for choosing the weakest proposal his White House advisors presented.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate