$4.9 Billion Judgment Latest in GM Liability Saga

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The $4.9 billion judgment against General Motors this month in a fuel-tank fire case is the latest chapter in a long saga involving independent counsel and former GM lawyer Kenneth Starr, accusations of perjury and obstruction of justice, and an infamous 1973 internal memo revealing that General Motors engineer Edward Ivey had placed the value of a human life at $200,000.

The record-settling judgment in the latest case centered on a California crash in which six people in a GM pickup truck were hit from behind by a drunk driver. The truck’s fuel tank exploded, seriously burning the occupants.

This is not the first time that memo has made headlines. Back in 1994, the now-familiar Kenneth Starr was representing GM in a suit brought by a South Carolina family whose two sons had been killed in a similar GM truck explosion. Starr has been accused of covering up perjury by Ivey. In April 1998, the Justice Department decided not to open an ethics probe into Starr’s role in the alleged coverup.

It is also important to note that, amid widespread agreement in the legal community that the California decision will be reduced by another court, General Motors is enjoying one of its biggest periods of growth and profit in history. On July 20, 1999, the company announced that it had record earnings in the second quarter of 1999, with a profit of $1.7 billion. At that rate, one could extrapolate that the company can afford to lose one major case a year related to fuel-tank fires and still make a few million in profit.

Read the original MoJo Wire story that uncovered the allegations against Starr, along with key documents and updates.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate