July 17, 1999

Communism for Profiteers

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


previous

Among the plenary workshops and panel discussions in development for the conference are “Making Money in China Today,” “Business and the People’s Liberation Army,” and — congressional investigators take note — “Expanding China’s High-Technology Industrial Base.” In the interest of diplomatic sensitivity, there will be no discussion of impolitic topics like human rights. Not surprisingly, that angers some activists.

“There are positive messages you can send and there are those that condition Chinese authorities to believe they can get away with unacceptable international behavior,” says Minky Worden, who lived in Hong Kong for six years and is now a spokeswoman for Human Rights Watch. “This sends an implicit message to Chinese officials that the [current] crackdown is just super with U.S. companies.”

To such criticisms, Fortune spokeswoman Terry McDevitt responds, “We’re a business magazine, not a political magazine. Human rights is not one of the things we normally cover.” She added, “Though I don’t want that to sound like no one here thinks about that.”

The Global Forum will also provide for one of those marvelous moments of media synergy. Time-Warner Inc., which publishes Fortune, is putting the production on. Another of Time-Warner’s subsidiaries, CNN, plans to air coverage of the event.

“It’s natural and appropriate for CNN to cover this gathering,” says Eason Jordan, president of international news for CNN. “The Forum brings together Chinese leaders and many of the world’s top business leaders in the world’s most populous nation on the 50th anniversary of its establishment,” he said. The potential conflict-of-interest will be avoided in the usual way, according to Jordan: “CNN in its reporting on the Forum will disclose what many people already know — CNN and Fortune have the same parent company, Time-Warner.”

Fortune’s Web site urges that interested parties recommend speakers for the magazine’s conferences. You might suggest Bao Tong, the government official who served seven years for speaking out in favor of the demonstrators at Tiananmen Square. Send your own recommendations to Fortune at fortuneconf@pathfinder.com.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate