The Who’s Better Off Game:Telecommunications Workers

It has become a favorite anectdote for opponents of international outsourcing — the call to a telephone operator that is answered in India or Singapore or China. But behind that bleak tale is an equally grim reality — telecommuncations jobs are disappearing, and those which remain are paying less and less. What’s more, customer service reps aren’t the only ones suffering…

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Jobs have disappeared at a steadier in the telecom industry than in perhaps any other sector. Operators are vanishing, thanks in part to automation and in part to outsourcing. Customer service jobs are disappearing too, shipped overseas or eliminated as companies downsize. And equipment installers are also out of work.

Operators have been hardest hit. Between 2000 and 2003, almost 15 percent of all operator jobs were lost. And operators’ income has dropped, too, with real wages falling .5 percent over the same period. Still, nationwide, there are only about a third as many operators as there are telecom customer service representatives. And operators, on average, earn about 20 percent less. But that’s not to suggest that customer service workers are doing any better.

Customer service jobs have declined across the telecom industry since 2000 — albeit at a slower rate that those for operators. The more worrying development is that real income for customer service workers has dropped sharply — down nearly 7 percent between 2000 and 2003. In California, where more customer service workers are employed than in any other state, the wage loss has been less dramatic — real income has slipped, but only by .37 percent. But jobs have disappeared in California far faster than elsewhere in the country. Between 2000 and 2003, more than 4.5 percent of all customer service jobs in California were elminated.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate