Buy First, Fly Later

“Don’t test, don’t tell” at the Pentagon

Illustration By: <a href="http://lobrow-illustration.com" target="new">Erik T. Johnson / lobrow-illustration.com</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Buy Now, Fly Later

“Don’t test, don’t tell” at the Pentagon


For a while, military reformers looked to be winning the battle against costly weapons systems that don’t work. In the 1970s, they scripted a new maxim, “Fly Before You Buy,”
and by the 1980s, they opened a new office in the Pentagon devoted to overseeing weapons testing. But in recent years, the tide has turned; the Pentagon’s own chief weapons tester, Thomas P. Christie,said in March 2004 that major weapons manufacturers are “learning faster how to avoid testing than we are learning to do it better.” And with each missed test, the public foots the bill for weapons that may place soldiers in unnecessary peril.

SYSTEM

COST

TESTING

RESULTS

Stryker Armored Vehicle

$8.7 billion

After purchasing hundreds of these personnel carriers in 2000, the Pentagon discovered that the Stryker’s armor did not protect against rocket-propelled grenades—one of the biggest threats to soldiers in Iraq.

The Army added a 5,000-pound cage around each vehicle, making them top-heavy and obstructing some escape hatches, according to a Pentagon report written after three soldiers aboard Strykers died during a routine Iraq mission.

Hercules C-130J Transport Plane

About $4 billion

The Air Force purchased the C-130J as a commercial, off-the-shelf airplane, even though it was the first of its kind, which meant… no need for much testing.

Pentagon auditors say the planes “cannot perform” intended missions, such as low-altitude night flying; 168 problems with the craft have been reported, many serious enough to cause crashes.

Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

$641 million through 2002

Pentagon testers declared the drone “not operational, effective or suitable” in September 2001.

So far nearly half of the 48 Predators deployed have crashed.

F/A-22 Raptor

$28.7 billion since 1986

Though the Air Force has spent billions to develop this fighter plane since the mid-’80s, official testing began only last year, exposing problems such as electronics that inexplicably shut down.

The Pentagon is ignoring calls for additional testing from congressional auditors, who noted in a recent report that it is not even clear “why this aircraft is needed.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate