Who Likes Phase-Out? Not the Affluent…

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Wow, a new poll reveals that 48 percent of all “business owners” and 49 percent of all “affluent consumers” don’t think Social Security phase-out is a good idea. Maybe they realize that financial collapse because of trillions of dollars of new debt really isn’t such a good thing after all.

Speaking of which, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has a new analysis of the radical Sununu-Ryan plan for privatization, now being touted by House conservatives who have given up any pretense that “reforming” Social Security is all about fiscal sanity and averting future actuarial imbalances.

The thing to see here is that the Sununu-Ryan plan would require transfers from the general budget of $79 trillion over the next 75 years. In other words, all you need to do is wave a magic wand and pour in trillions of dollars, and you can create a really cool social program! Well, no kidding. Look, if you think Social Security is currently on an “unsustainable course” all because we may need to raise either income or payroll taxes slightly over the next 75 years to continue paying out the full benefits promised by the program, that’s one thing. But please note, if the ground rules dictate that we’re allowed to transfer $79 trillion over the next 75 years from the general budget to Social Security, then we can pretty much solve any of our current problems three times over. How long before the press realizes that all this carping about “insolvency” by Republicans is really just a red herring?

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate