The Purpose-Driven Gift

Lobbyists can finally leave gift-giving to the experts.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Imagine the Ghosts of Christmas Past for Washington lobbyists. Forced to take time off from eating lunch and talking on their cell phones to round up gift baskets for congressmen and their staffs. At best, the process was hit or miss. Would the agriculture committee members really be swayed by chocolate U.S. Capitol domes from the dairy industry, or booze from the Distilled Spirits Council? Is it gauche to send a Jewish lawmaker a holiday ham?

Now, lobbyists can leave gift-giving to the experts. This past holiday season, a new company, Gift Strategies Inc., offered influence-peddlers the opportunity to purchase gifts for lawmakers and their staffs with a click of a mouse. According to their website, “Gift Strategies can help maximize the impact of gifting to influential individuals, providing a large selection of quality products tailored to the interests of recipients.”

Gift Strategies delivers such goodies as 10-year-old port, champagne, bath and beauty products, food baskets, and imported chocolates. They even have a special selection of gifts under the heading “staffer stuffers.” The website allows the truly conscientious lobbyist to keep track of which pols he’s given to and how much he’s spent per person. Brendan Hilley, who launched the firm this fall, said that facilitating gifts between K Street and Capitol Hill seemed a natural opportunity. “I saw it as a market” because “Washington, D.C., is the business of politics.”

 

 

Hilley’s familiarity with the ways of Washington runs deep: His father, John Hilley, was the Clinton administration’s congressional liaison. Hilley stresses that his business is nonpartisan—he walked the halls of both Republican and Democratic lobby firms and corpo-rate offices to gin up holiday business. (He declined to provide a client list.) Yet his venture is bucking the historic downtrend in the value of gifts.

 

 

“Back in the good old days there were always stories about high-ranking staffers receiving fur coats and nice watches. There was a fair amount of lavishness for key folks,” bemoans Peter Jacoby, a lobbyist for AT&T. And Ed Kutler, a former staffer for Newt Gingrich who now works as a lobbyist, says wistfully, “In the old days if you were in a position of responsibility, you were inundated with liquor and food and all kinds of stuff.”

 

 

That was supposed to end under the ethics restrictions adopted in 1995, which limited lobbyists to giving each member of Congress or staffer only two gifts a year, valued at no more than $50 each. The curbs initially damped the freebies. Then loopholes developed and things got back to normal, until “normal” was redefined by Jack Abramoff and Tom DeLay. How will Hilley’s business do in a once-again scandal-shy Washington?

 

 

The politician’s son replies: “I have nothing else to say.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate