Jargon Watch: “Long War” Goes the Way of GWOT

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Man, if only the Pentagon put as much effort into winning the war as it does into rebranding its losing efforts.

Remember when
GWOT (Global War On Terrorism) became GSAVE (Global War on Violent Extremism). Well, at least that’s what Donald Rumsfeld proposed back in 2005. Evidently, even Bush thought this was stupid.

As for the “long war”—this one was coined by Gen. John P. Abizaid before he retired as head of the Central Command. According to the NYT, “it was intended to signal to the American public that the country was involved in a lengthy struggle that went well beyond the war in Iraq and was political as well as military.”

Except, whoops, folks in the Middle East took it to mean that they’d be occupied for a long time. The Times also notes that U.S. officials seem to be using the phrases “Islamic fascism” and “jihadist” less regularly, as they seem to have offended Muslims worldwide, and even helped recruit folks to fight us. (D’oh!) The Pentagon has also dropped “Salafist Extremist Network,” presumably because only Juan Cole knew what it meant.

“We continue to look for other options to characterize the scope of current operations,” said a Pentagon spokesperson.

SNAFU? Vietnam II? Hundred Years War?

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate