Good Works for Fun and Profit: Socially Responsible Businesspeople Invade San Francisco

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


bsr_logo_white.pngYesterday I swung by the 2007 Business for Social Responsibility‘s annual conference. A BSR coordinator told me that more than 1,300 people had registered, and when I arrived, it looked as if most of them were milling around the imposing lobby of San Francisco’s Grand Hyatt Regency hotel.

Why were they there? Cynics will always say that where business is concerned, social responsibility is useful only for PR purposes. In some cases, that still might be true, but these days, this idea is (thankfully) quickly becoming outmoded. At one session I attended, “Women’s Health: The Key to Development?,” the overall message was a no-brainer: When young female factory employees have access to medical care and information about workers’ rights, absenteeism declines and overall morale improves. The logistics of such initiatives, though, can get hairy. In China, for example, factories typically won’t allow any programs that could prompt workers to organize, so educators have to sneak lessons about labor rights into their health classes. Clever.

This is not to say that PR wasn’t on the minds of many conference attendees. Another session, “NGOs in the YouTube World: Prepare for the Onslaught” packed a large conference room. The crowd laughed nervously as a panelist showed how Oxfam skewered Starbucks in a YouTube video about the company’s poor treatment of coffee growers in Ethiopia. They seemed to cheer up a bit when they learned about the outcome: Starbucks cleaned up its act and made a response video, and Oxfam posted a thank you video in return. (You can see the whole heartwarming exchange here).

More companies seem to be figuring out that ostentatious displays of social responsibility are, as a rule, cringeworthy. But not everyone has learned this important lesson. Amidst the programs, annual reports, and maps of the hotel in my conference goody bag, I found some corporate schmaltz—a small purple Hallmark portfolio (Hallmark is one of the conference’s main sponsors) containing three sample greeting cards and a sappy, glitter-strewn bit of text entitled “Hallmark’s Environmental Vision.” (“Enriching lives is our business and our passion. It is our promise for tomorrow as well as for today…”). Hallmark’s glitter is now all over my keyboard, and the sample cards have gone to my recycle bin. Another souvenir was a booklet called If You Decide To Quit Smoking, produced by Philip Morris. Needless to say, this too headed directly into my recycle bin. Guess this year’s conference theme, “designing a sustainable future,” did not apply to the goody bags.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate