# Joe Biden’s Amazing Numerical Recall

Following Joe Biden on the campaign trail earlier today, I heard him address the issues of education and high-speed internet access at the Iowa Valley Continuing Education Conference Center in Marshalltown, Iowa. Biden drifted off and on prepared remarks, shifting from his written notes to paragraphs of memorized stump speech to long, off-the-cuff monologues. The result was a speech that fluctuated pretty wildly in volume and energy. In all, though, Biden had an excellent command of the facts and was able to draw on years of experience in the senate (the man was elected at 29 and is now 65) to illustrate his points. I’m going to write more about him, likely tomorrow, but for now, I want to point out something fun.

Joe Biden really loves facts and figures. I was stunned at the quantity of numbers he could pack into a paragraph. Here are two examples. Remember, these are verbatim quotes.

“By 2015, China is going to have twice the number of college graduates as the United States and Europe combined. In 2004, China graduated 350,000 engineers, computer scientists, and information technologists with four-year degrees, while we graduated 140,000. One out of five scientists and engineers in the United States are foreign born. We rank in the top five in the proportion of young people who attend college, but we rank 16th in the proportion of young people who graduate from college.”

I count ten numbers in that paragraph. In the next one, Biden gets even more intense by doing some quick mental mathematics.

“I have proposed what I call the Biden College Access Program. It’s families with incomes up to—big incomes—up to \$150,000 a year, combined income, gives them a \$3,000 refundable tax credit. So if a husband and wife is making a combined \$80,000-\$90,000 a year, and they have two kids in college, try paying for…. [for college in Iowa,] you’re talking about 10 grand a year, or probably more, I don’t know the exact number. In my state it’s about \$9,600 to \$10,500. Point is, that comes after taxes, folks. So two people, combined income, \$90,000, they may have a \$55,000 disposable income, and they’ve gotta come up with \$22,000 to send two kids to school? Pretty tough. So this \$3,000 refundable tax credit is just that, if you owe the federal government in your taxes 3,000 bucks, you owe them nothing. If you owe them 2,000, they send you back a check for a 1,000. If you’re in a family with an income under \$50,000, you get a Pell Grant for \$6,300 and you get a \$3,000 refundable tax credit, giving you \$9,600 dollars to send your kid to school.”

Twenty-one numbers. In a passage that is 190 words. That’s one number every 9.05 words. Now Biden’s got me doing it.

For more on the actual content of Biden’s comments, see the “Online Nation” portion of his website.

### WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about \$45,000 short of our \$300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of \$350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

### WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about \$45,000 short of our \$300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of \$350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.