Caucus Predictions: A Fool’s Errand, but Popular Nonetheless

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Fred Barnes on Fox News just predicted that Obama will best Clinton tonight, and that because of Clinton’s formerly inevitable status, it will make worldwide news. That’s a courageous move by Barnes only because making any predictions today is risky—any of the top three Democrats could win and either Romney or Huckabee could take the Republican race. I’m going to chicken out/be completely honest and admit that I have no real idea what’s going to happen. I think the Des Moines Register‘s last poll will be correct enough to give Obama a slight win, but let’s not put that in print or on a blog or anything. And I think Romney’s long-established and well-financed turnout machine will give the former MA governor the win over Huckabee and his still-nascent campaign. But again, I’m not going to stand by that. Aren’t you glad I’m here?

Let’s take a look around the punditocracy and see what the predictions are of those a little ballsier than I.

Tom Bevan at Real Clear Politics has this to say:

I’ll be shocked if Barack Obama doesn’t win. In fact, I think he’s potentially sitting on a very big win. He seems to have upward momentum in the polls, his crowds are huge, and his message appears to still be connecting with voters and there is no indication that he’s experiencing an erosion of support in the final hours of the campaign. In other words, all the signs are pointing to a strong finish for Obama.

As I’ve said before, that will open the door for him to run the table on Clinton in the early states, especially if she finishes third – which I think she might. I’m hesitant to underestimate the Clinton people or their organizing ability, but from what I can tell she has nowhere near the enthusiasm in her campaign or among her supporters to match Edwards or Obama….

On the Republican side, the two-man race is literally a coin flip. My sense is the campaigns themselves believe it is so close it could go either way. Romney appears to have the better organization, but the polls say Huckabee has the more committed supporters.

Tom Schaller at the American Prospect:

I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that Democrat Hillary Clinton might still win this thing in Iowa, and that Mitt Romney is even more likely than she is to hold on for the Republican victory.

I’m much less confident about the Clinton prediction, so let me start with her. First, there’s no doubt that we’re going to see a turnout surge, and that’s probably bad news for John Edwards. So the question becomes whether it’s a major surge (good for Obama) or a smaller one (good for Clinton)…. I just don’t think all of those young people and other newbies Obama is counting on will be there at the rates they expect….

I still just don’t see how the Huckabee team converts their late momentum and buzz into caucus support. The Huckabee operation is spartan and under-organized compared to Romney and his gobs of money, and to admit that fact and then turnaround and predict Huckabee wins is to reject all the conventional wisdom for the Republican race that is simultaneously being applied to the Democratic race.

There were rumors that both Biden and Richardson were going throw their second-choice support to Obama, as Kucinich did. That would make an Obama win a lot more likely. But both the Delaware Senator and the New Mexico Governor have denied that that’s the case.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate