Candidates Earn Their Hipster Cred

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


deadhead-obama-200.jpgWalking home from work earlier this week, I came across a ginormous crowd outside San Francisco’s Warfield Theater waiting to attend a “Deadheads For Obama” show. Patchouli hung heavy in the air, and radios played jam-band music while eager fans waited to get inside and hear members of the Grateful Dead rock out.

Maybe I live in a cave or something, but I had no idea that the deadhead scene had become politically engaged, let alone caught Obama fever. But they’re not the only ones endorsing candidates:

Hip-hop icon Russell Simmons spoke out against Obama, after the senator claimed that hip-hop lyrics were to blame for Don Imus’ racist rant, and instead gave a thumbs up to Kucinich, who also was endorsed by System of a Down’s lead singer Serj Tankian.

Despite the Simmons diss, Obama’s managed to align himself with arguably more important celebs such as rappers Kanye West and Jay-Z. As my Riff cohort Party Ben pointed out, the Arcade Fire, despite their Canadian-ness, are also on the Obama train, along with folk singer Joan Baez, Dave Matthews and Robert DeNiro, and Wilco and Bright Eyes.

Camp Hillary is getting love from rapper 50 Cent and Perez Hilton, and Quincy Jones, Madonna, Jon Bon Jovi and Tony Bennett.

If these endorsements are any indication, Obama is notches above Clinton in hipster points. But do endorsements from famous people really help? One study says not so much, and while a handful of bloggers (including myself) poke fun at celebs’ presidential picks, we’re still taking notice. And let’s face it, when the Grateful Dead (sans Jerry Garcia) gets “fired up” to vote for Obama and tells a sold-out crowd of die-hard fans to do the same, it must count for something. Obama may prefer his ’60s and ’70s soul tunes, but a deadhead vote is as good as any other.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate