“Kristen” Is a Blameworthy Slut? Yawn.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Today in a Salon video post, Farhad Manjoo calls the MySpace dimension of the Eliot Spitzer scandal “interesting and kind of fascinating and cool.”

Really? I’m not so sure MySpace makes this scandal any different than the old ones. At the end of the day, the media is doing exactly what they always do: backhandedly blaming the object of a politician’s lust for bringing about his downfall with her sluttiness.

At the risk of alienating my friends in the Facebook Generation, here’s the thing: I could give a crap about the “true identity” (if that’s what a MySpace page is) of the young woman whom Eliot Spitzer paid for sex, let alone the fact that she once sang “Respect” in the shower at her boyfriend’s house.

And now, as Feministing points out, we’re also supposed to believe that she’s into it. That Dupre is under the impression that this turn of events is going to make her into the superstar she’s always wanted to be.

Simmer down, Kiera, commenters will undoubtedly say. Who wouldn’t want to know about the sordid details of an admittedly beautiful woman involved in a high-class prostitution ring? Well, I think it’s more complicated—and insidious—than that.

When I read the New York Times piece about Dupre, my first thought was, she sounds totally annoying. I found myself blaming her for her irritating narcissism (“I am all about my music and my music is all about me. It flows from what I’ve been through, what I’ve seen and how I feel”), and her delusions of grandeur. This girl sounds insufferable, I thought.

And all of a sudden I had forgotten a key point: Dupre didn’t do anything wrong. Spitzer did.

FOLLOW THE MONEY

Corporations and billionaires don’t fund journalism like ours that exists to shake things up. Instead, support from readers allows Mother Jones to call it like it is without fear, favor, or false equivalence.

And right now, a longtime friend of Mother Jones has pledged an incredibly generous gift to inspire—and double—giving from online readers. That's huge! Because you can see that our fall fundraising drive is well behind the $325,000 we need to raise. So if you agree that in-depth, fiercely independent journalism matters right now, please support our work and help us raise the money it takes to keep Mother Jones charging hard. Your gift, and all online donations up to $94,000 total, will be matched and go twice as far—but only until the November 9 deadline.

$400,000 to go: Please help us pick up the pace!

payment methods

FOLLOW THE MONEY

Corporations and billionaires don’t fund journalism like ours that exists to shake things up. Instead, support from readers allows Mother Jones to call it like it is without fear, favor, or false equivalence.

And right now, a longtime friend of Mother Jones has pledged an incredibly generous gift to inspire—and double—giving from online readers. That's huge! Because you can see that our fall fundraising drive is well behind the $325,000 we need to raise. So if you agree that in-depth, fiercely independent journalism matters right now, please support our work and help us raise the money it takes to keep Mother Jones charging hard. Your gift, and all online donations up $94,000 total, will be matched and go twice as far—but only until the November 9 deadline.

$400,000 to go: Please help us pick up the pace!

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate