A Former GI’s Perspective on the War Mea Culpas

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Be sure to read Greg Mitchell’s excellent piece on the media’s failings in covering both the Iraq War and the run up to it. He’s almost entirely right that the we’ve been unthinking hawks, lap dogs, and sorta cowardly, but there have been some ‘come to Jesus’ moments among journalists as we contemplate the war’s fifth anniversary.

In particular, I was surprised and impressed by Slate’s hawks critiquing their own role in supporting the war, 20-20 hindsight being what it is. They were brave and pretty hard on themselves. It would be easy to ‘stay the course’ a la you know who, but they dropped plenty of dimes on themselves. It’s called “Why did we get it wrong?”

While you’re piling on us, don’t forget 9/11 itself; even we narcissistic journos got all patriotic after that happened. I even briefly considered re-upping after 14 years a civilian.

No shit. So, with 9/11 in mind, also check out this confession from the NY Times reporter who sat on the wiretapping story for 13 months. We’re at war, but there’s no question that we haven’t done our jobs well enough. We gave the government the benefit of the doubt and learned to regret it. I’m guessing we’ve learned our lesson, and no future president will be seeing either benefits or doubts from us.

Still, I’m in no position to criticize the liberal hawks. As a former GI, I was repeatedly asked for my opinion on going to war and stayed mum. The stakes were just too high, and I was just too undecided and too overbooked to give the question the study it deserved. At least those who took a stand, you know, took a stand.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate