The Right’s Quest to Marginalize Obama Supporters

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This essay from conservative Michael Barone about how Obama supporters are “academics and public employees” while Clinton/McCain supporters are Jacksonians (aka red-blooded Americans) is popping up around the web. Aside from being an overly simplistic reading of America’s culture wars, parts of it are downright loony (“Warriors are competitors for the honor that academics and public employees think rightfully belongs to them,” writes Barone. “Jacksonians, in contrast, place a high value on the virtues of the warrior”).

Jonathan Chait, who efficiently shreds Barone’s argument, calls this what it is, “a conservative anti-intellectual slur.” I think a better way to understand what Barone is getting at is something I linked to in my “dating map” blog post yesterday — Obama takes his support from young voters, African-Americans, and what Richard Florida calls “the creative class.” The creative class is composed of “inventors, entrepreneurs, engineers, artists, musicians, designers and professionals in idea-driven industries.” By Florida’s calculations, the creative class makes up about 35 percent of the working population, while the “working class” as traditionally understood makes up just 23 percent. To prove his theory, Florida did some fancy polling with John Zogby that you can check out here. It’s pretty persuasive, though we don’t know their methodology.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate