How Obama Could Capture Hillary Voters: Answer the Obvious

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Below is a guest blog entry by economist and MoJo author Nomi Prins:

Hillary Clinton‘s speech has been duly dissected. Bill’s will be, too. But the DNC question still lingering for the PUMAs is: Why didn’t Obama choose Clinton as his running mate? Dems would be naïve to suggest such people just ‘get over it,’ Hillary’s verbal push not withstanding.

Love it or hate it, it’s a valid question, particularly for the women who did and do identify with her. And it’s a question that Obama needs to at least acknowledge, if not address.

Why? Because in the absence of a resounding statement from Camp Obama, the bloviosphere has filled in the gap with excuses like these: She’s too divisive, he couldn’t deal with Bill, the Clintons are too powerful, she wouldn’t have wanted it anyway.

Whatever. A strong person campaigning for the most powerful office in the world should be able to answer difficult questions head on. With swing state voters, can Obama really afford to play the Hillary card so close to the vest?

There may be little Obama can, or feels he should, say on the matter. Some observers will argue that Biden’s fine, and the Veep post isn’t a deciding factor anyway. Those are presumptive thoughts in a dead heat.

The bottom line is this: Everyone knows someone who doesn’t understand why Obama didn’t choose Hillary. Until that question’s answered, the DNC’s usual pundits are missing a key conversation in Denver diners, playgrounds, hospitals, truck stops, and discount stores.

—Nomi Prins

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate