Biden Addresses (and Readdresses) Partition in Iraq

Test Ticker

Support Mother Jones with a year-end donation

Here are the facts: 1) We urgently need to raise $350,000 in online donations this month; 2) Readers told us fundraising is annoying; 3) Both journalism and US democracy are in trouble. So, to make this as un-annoying as possible, we’re hoping less is more right now—and we focus on three simple questions: Why us, why now, and why does your support for our journalism matter? We need a lot of help this month and can’t afford to come up short again. Please make a year-end gift if you can right now.

We need to raise $350,000 in online donations this month to keep Mother Jones charging hard. But readers told us fundraising is annoying, and we don’t want to add to the overwhelming noise. So we’re hoping less is more right now, and that we can “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” in making the case for the year-end gifts we need. Please help if you can right now.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

I wrote before Joe Biden was picked for VP that his endgame for Iraq appeared fundamentally at odds with Obama’s. That has changed: Biden has softened his support for a plan to partition Iraq into three sect-based regions and has embraced Obama’s plan to withdraw combat troops in 16 months. A Biden insider told Politico, “There’s no daylight between these guys on Iraq now. None.”

But things are not so simple in Joe Biden’s brain. Asked to comment on the one-time disagreement, Biden spoke for 13 minutes and 20 seconds. ABC News has the full response. It’s really something to behold, and touches on almost every aspect of the war in Iraq. The overarching point that Biden makes is, “Withdrawal by itself doesn’t work. Partition by itself doesn’t work. Staying the course by itself doesn’t work. The situation is complex. I understand the complexity.”