SNL Gets Gay

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-snagglepuss.jpgNot to be all-Prop-8-all-the-time over here on the Riff, but there was some surprising, funny, and surprisingly funny stuff on SNL Saturday night, and some of the best bits seemed to be inspired by the sudden re-emergence of gay rights as a newsy topic. In fact, homosexuality was pretty much the running theme of the whole episode, from the overly-kissy family opening sketch (which culminated in a jaw-dislocating open-mouth snog between Andy Samberg and Fred Armisen) to the baffling-but-hilarious digital short featuring Samberg and host Paul Rudd painting each other’s naked portraits, Titanic-style. Justin Timberlake’s lispy cameo as one of three terrible male dancers in leotards in a Beyonce video also might count. By the way, somebody give Justin Timberlake a variety show—his two-minute version of himself hosting the show was pretty mind-blowing.

After the jump: Heavens to Murgatroyd!

There were two bits that were both hilarious and oddly heartwarming. First, when Weekend Update host Seth Meyers started to introduce a segment by announcing Prop 8’s passage in California, the audience erupted in loud boos. It was an amazing, unusual moment, and Meyers was clearly taken aback, responding with an “okay, vote’s over, thank you.” The bit he was introducing turned out to be awesome: a response to Prop 8 by none other than Snagglepuss, the overdramatic pink cartoon lion who, in retrospect, seems profoundly, obviously gay.

The second bit featured two parking lot attendants in a typical setup: they appear at first to be typical homophobes, until their dialogue turns more homoerotic than homophobic. What made the sketch oddly touching was that they took it to the next level, with one of the parking attendants finally asking the other for his hand in marriage. By the end, you could almost believe these two, with their goofball banter about gay stuff being “hilarious,” might actually be in love. (Still searching for video on that one).

Sure, some thought the episode seemed to fall into the “over-the-top I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry brand of gay,” meaning, I guess, an attempt at enlightened comedy that only ends up reinforcing stereotypes. Sure, Samberg’s digital shorts get their chuckles at least in part from homoeroticism at least 60% of the time, and it would be nice if the cast had any openly gay performers–where have you been, Terry Sweeney? The episode was also a sausage fest, with few major roles for the show’s talented women–Prop 8 banned lesbian marriage too, you know. But while the comedy often aimed for absurdity or adolescent giggles, it never struck me as offensive. On the contrary, it seems like more evidence of an emerging trend, that Prop 8 and its ilk have finally woken up the queers and friends-of-queers, and that while the Mormons may have won a battle, they got way more than they bargained for.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate