Grammy Preview: M.I.A. About to Pop, Radiohead On the March?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


While it’s understandable if you’re a cynic about the usually-preposterous Grammy Awards, Sunday night’s show actually promises some nail-biting races and some dramatic, “will-they-or-won’t-they” performances. First of all, singer M.I.A., up for Record of the Year for “Paper Planes,” is scheduled to perform, despite the fact that she is very, very preggers. In fact, tomorrow Sunday is apparently her due date, if you can believe it. Will her wee Arulpragasam pop out right at the “ka-ching” noise in “Planes,” or will an early arrival force her to cancel? Also upping the drama quotient is Radiohead, who are not scheduled to perform (and have never performed at the Grammys), but rumors are flying all the way to Pitchfork, who seem to believe the Brit combo will play In Rainbows‘ jazzy, drum-led 5/4 opener “15 Step” accompanied by the USC marching band. Hooray Radiohead, but ugh, marching bands—they’re so, you know, “Hollaback Girl.” Pitchfork also holds out hope for a Kanye/Radiohead mashup performance, which would make me pleased for Earworm but sad for myself, since it’s long been a secret wish to see, for instance, Liam Gallagher wander out on to the Grammys stage for a surprise duet with Green Day—even if I don’t get a shout-out.

MTV already made some predictions about who will win (Coldplay, yes; Lil Wayne, nope) but I suppose I can try my hand at calling what the wrinkled old geezers in the Recording Academy will vote for without ever having heard it. My predictions in a few categories after the jump.Record of the Year
Adele – “Chasing Pavements”
Coldplay – “Viva la Vida”
Leona Lewis – “Bleeding Love”
M.I.A. – “Paper Planes” (Should win, 50% chance will win)
Robert Plant & Alison Krauss – “Please Read the Letter” (50% chance will win)

Coldplay would have been a shoo-in for this one, but the Satriani thing (and general negative reviews) has almost assuredly affected Grammy voters’ opinions, legitimately or not. M.I.A.’s stock is rising fast (especially with Slumdog the seemingly unstoppable Oscar juggernaut), but I’m not sure she can pull it off, and it was for a stoner movie before that, which Academy voters probably haven’t forgotten. Adele and Lewis are too light (and cancel each other out), leaving Plant & Krauss as the type of thing Grammy loves to love: dull-as-toast, industry-veteran, medium-level commercial success. I’d say it’s a tossup.

Album of the Year
Coldplay – Viva La Vida Or Death And All His Friends
Lil Wayne – Tha Carter III
Ne-Yo – Year Of The Gentleman
Robert Plant & Alison Krauss – Raising Sand
Radiohead – In Rainbows (Should win, will win)

Another tough category. Wayne has critical acclaim and massive sales, but swears a lot, and is also a rapper, although if he doesn’t win, the Academy faces (more) accusations of racism. Radiohead have critical acclaim and industry-changing accolades, but is their pay-what-you-want screw-the-labels approach something the Recording Academy wants to reward? And does all that mean Robert Plant & Alison Krauss will sneak up from behind as Wayne and Radiohead split the vote? I’ll give it to Radiohead, but just barely.

Song of the Year
Estelle – American Boy
Adele – Chasing Pavements
Jason Mraz – I’m Yours
Sara Bareilles – Love Song
Coldplay – Viva La Vida

God, who cares?!

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate