Are Journalists Running the Obama Administration?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Right-wingers are always complaining that journalists are hopelessly biased liberals, but lately they seem to think they have new evidence to support the old beef. The latest edition of “Obama-Biden Watch,” a newsletter published by the rabidly conservative group Citizens United, contains a short feature on all of the mainstream reporters who’ve recently joined the Obama administration.

Among those singled out by CU: Chicago Tribune reporter Jill Zuckerman, who’s headed to the Transportation Department; former Time magazine Washington bureau chief Jay Carney, who’s gone to work in Biden’s office; Peter Gosselin, a former Los Angeles Times reporter, who’s now a speechwriter for Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner; and former ABC News correspondent Linda Douglass, who worked on the Obama campaign and is rumored to be slated for a job at Health and Human Services. The newsletter came out before the news of Obama’s appointment of Nancy Ann DeParle to a senior post at HHS, but no doubt her marriage to New York Times poverty reporter Jason DeParle might have rated a mention as well.
 
Of course plenty of journalists also went to work in the Bush administration (think Tony Snow and Karen Hughes), so the liberal bias connection is still, as always, pretty weak. But it’s even weaker if you consider that this latest flight of reporters into government is happening at the same time the newspaper industry is imploding. It’s not entirely surprising to find reporters from the bankrupt Tribune Company papers on the list of new Obama administration officials. In this economic climate, the government is one of the few places that’s hiring!

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate