Lessig’s Change Congress Targets Dem Senator

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last week, copyright guru Lawrence Lessig‘s Change Congress organization, which hopes to reduce the influence of money in politics, accused Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) of undermining Americans’ faith in politics by creating the appearance of corruption.

What exactly did the Senator do wrong? Well, Nelson accepted over $2 million in campaign cash from the insurance industry. He also happened to embrace the industry’s position on health care reform, declaring his opposition to giving Americans the option of a government-run health care plan. (Nelson has since hedged a bit.)

Nelson’s behavior is an example of “Good souls corruption,” Lessig explained: “legal, even ethical acts that reasonably lead the public to wonder whether it is the merits or the money that is driving this Senator’s decision.”

ben nelson adAs I wrote last week, Nelson seemed to take the criticism both seriously and personally, lashing out in a defensive press release. But Change Congress hasn’t let up. This week, the non-profit launched an internet ad targeted at Nebraskans (you can see an image of the ad to the left) but this effort isn’t nearly as effective as the mailer.

Congress’ first attacks on Nelson were potent because they were harsh and they zeroed in on the issue of corruption. The original mailer asked whether Nelson would “sell out Nebraska for $2 million?” That directness has prompted politicians to respond to CC’s attacks, often emotionally. It’s the responses that will draw the most media attention to Lessig’s cause.

This latest ad is much weaker because it focuses on health care. There’s no indication that the CC is talking about what Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor has suggested are basically “bribes”—huge sums that lawmakers raise from businesses and special interest groups in order to win re-election. A more effective ad would have mirrored the mailer or just gone ahead and used the word “corruption.”

The new ad also runs the risk of pigeonholing campaign-finance reform as a liberal cause, not a public good. Government-run health insurance is a great idea, but it’s also a liberal one. Next time, the organization would do well to highlight an issue that isn’t identified so closely with the left. If Lessig really wants to change congress, he and his supporters need to convince everyday conservatives that money in politics hurts them, too.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate