The Best Defense

A brief but sorry history of defense reform.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


President Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates have promised widespread reforms to smoke out waste and abuse at the Pentagon. Sounds fantastic—except that Washington has been churning out blue-ribbon commissions, special task forces, and tough new laws ever since the Pentagon was created.

1949: Landmark Hoover Commission exposes rampant waste at the Pentagon.

1961: President Dwight D. Eisenhower warns of growing might of the “military industrial complex” in last speech as commander in chief. (Aides talked him out of saying “military industrial congressional complex.”)

1970: DOD bigwig David Packard and Fitzhugh Commission pledge to fix contracting process, offer groundbreaking suggestion to “fly before you buy.” Armed Services establish testing offices to make sure that weapons they buy actually work; offices later found to be ineffective because industry was allowed to help design tests.

1980s: Congress requires competitive bidding, accurate cost assessments, and accounting oversight. Defense lobby spends next two decades watering down reforms.

1981: DOD No. 2 Frank Carlucci introduces 32 initiatives to produce more accurate price estimates and increase competition; fails.

1982: Nunn-McCurdy Amendment orders termination of programs whose costs have grown by more than 25 percent over original estimates. However, Congress routinely makes exceptions at the secretary of defense’s request. Today nearly half the DOD’s big weapons programs are in breach of the law.

1986: David Packard heads a new commission, discovers nothing has changed since Fitzhugh Commission 16 years earlier. After measures based on his recommendations to “streamline” acquisitions are introduced, cost overruns on Air Force and development contracts more than triple.

1990s: Series of innovative procurement “reforms” causes acquisitions staff at DOD to be slashed by 50 percent by 2000; much of the work is outsourced.

2002: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld strips away crucial oversight of missile defense program.

2003: The Army puts Future Combat Systems under “lead systems integrator” contract—meaning the firms that design and build systems also oversee contracting. FCS will go more than 60 percent over budget before being canceled in June.

April 2009: Gates says he’ll stop outsourcing oversight and will add 20,000 acquisition staffers by 2015. Senators Carl Levin and John McCain then pass Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009—promising legislation shot full of holes before it reaches Obama’s desk. Law establishes an office of independent cost assessment; interim director is ex-Raytheon lobbyist William Lynn, who strenuously opposed the office’s creation.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate