A Lobbyist By Any Other Name Smells Just As Bad

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Business Week has an interesting piece this week about the stigma of lobbying in the age of Obama, and how it’s driving lobbyists to rethink how they do business. True to form, some of the industry’s heavy-hitters have found a loophole: they’ve stopped calling themselves lobbyists. Obama pal Tom Daschle is now a “strategist” and “special policy adviser” on health care and finance at Alston & Bird; GOP lobbyist kingpin Ed Gillespie styles his services as “strategic planning,” “message development,” and “crisis management.” The new jargon, of course, means that they don’t have to register or disclose information about their lobbying activities. Sorry, I mean their strategizing activities.

The new terminology is convenient in another way, too: It allows Daschle to play the role of an independent expert on health care rather than someone with a direct financial stake in the legislative battle. For instance, Newsweek recently interviewed him about the issue, describing him only as Obama’s failed nominee for health care czar who is now “watching from the sidelines.” For his part, Daschle coyly noted that he felt “very fortunate to be able to play the role of what I would call a resource to members of Congress and to the White House and to others who are interested in public policy relating to health care.”   

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate