October 13, 2009

Another Day, Another Two Solar Steps in California

Photo courtesy of Governor's Office

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It seems like every week there’s another photo op for California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signing a new solar power bill, preparing to plunge a shovel into the earth at the groundbreaking ceremony for a new PV plant or standing on a rooftop, surveying a new solar array.

This week was no exception. On Sunday night, the Governator signed two new solar bills into law.

But all the emphasis on this one person can leave the impression that California’s commitment to solar power and Schwarzenegger’s star power are one and the same. Fortunately, it’s a misimpression.

Senator Gloria Negrete McLeodSenator Gloria Negrete McLeod

Take the two bills that the Governor signed this week. The first, SB-32, provides a new “feed-in-tariff” so that utilties must pay a higher rate when buying excess electricity produced by medium-sized solar generators and fed back into the grid.

Schwarzenegger signed the bill, but first it had to be introduced into the state Senate by Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod (D-Chino), a first term legislator representing the state’s 32nd District. From 2000 to 2006 McLeod served in the State Assembly (62nd District).

 

The second, and related, solar bill signed this week mandates net-metering. The California Solar Surplus Act (AB-920) requires utilities to pay customers for any electricity generated by rooftop systems and not used by the custome.

That bill was written by Assemblyman Jared Huffman (D-Marin), elected to the Assembly last November by voters in the state’s 6th District. Before the election, Huffman had been a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Assemblyman Jared HuffmanAssemblyman Jared Huffman

The governor will be leaving office in January, and supporters of solar power will be looking for someone who will not be content simply to equal Schwarzenegger’s record on renewable energy and climate change. While that’s important, green voters will have to keep an eye on politicians at all levels of government if California is to remain a leader in these vital areas.

(A pdf packet of the bills with bio-notes on both McLeod and Huffman can be downloaded here.)

—————————

 Osha Gray Davidson is a contributing blogger at Mother Jones and publisher of The Phoenix Sun, an online news service reporting on solar energy. You can follow his tweets @thephoenixsun.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate