Two Big LGBT Endorsements For Sestak

Photo used under a Creatives Commons license by Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/progressohio/">ProgressOhio</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Two important endorsements came through for insurgent Pennsylvania Senate candidate Rep. Joe Sestak yesterday, prompted by his progressive stance on LGBT issues, especially “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Outspoken opponent of the policy Lieutenant Dan Choi and openly gay Rep. Barney Frank (D- Mass.) both announced their support.

The press release for Choi’s endorsement was reprinted on the blog Pam’s House Blend:

“Putting the Army-Navy rivalry aside, I’m here to support Joe Sestak,” Choi said. “Joe understands that equal rights for gay and lesbian people is the civil rights test of our generation. As the highest ranking Veteran ever elected to Congress, he spent 31 years serving our country in the Navy fighting for our rights. He has been a leader in working to end “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” and as Pennsylvania’s next Senator, Joe Sestak will continue to put principle over politics.”

Frank, who is the first member of Congress to back Sestak, also said at a Philadelphia press conference yesterday that he admires Sestak’s stance on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

Sen. Arlen Specter (D- Pa.), who Sestak will challenge this November, also opposes the policy and recently called for repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (even though he voted for it in 1996). However, some of Specter’s colleagues, Barney included, have criticized his party switch from Republican to Democrat earlier this year. In his endorsement, Frank pointedly called Sestak a “true Democrat,” and added “I have to say I don’t think it did our profession any good for [Specter] to announce that he switched parties purely so he could survive.”

Specter helped the Democrats secure their 60-seat majority in the Senate, but with members of Congress suggesting his party allegiance is disingenuous, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Sestak keep gaining momentum in his drive to overtake Specter in the 2010 election.

While we’re on the subject of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” see yesterday’s Q&A with author and researcher Nathaniel Frank.
 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate