Coakley’s Pollster Joins Halter Campaign

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


After Martha Coakley’s disastrous run for the Senate in Massachusetts, one might wonder what’s next on the agenda for the consultants and operatives who staffed her campaign. Coakley’s pollster Celinda Lake has landed well. She’s now working for a very different kind of candidate: progressive darling Bill Halter, the Arkansas Lieutenant Governor who announced Monday that he would challenge Sen. Blanche Lincoln in the state’s Democratic primary.

Lake confirmed to Mother Jones that she is working for Halter’s primary bid, though she declined to comment further without clearance from the campaign staff. A leading Democratic pollster, Lake was among those whom Rahm Emanuel and other top officials reportedly blamed for Coakley’s spectacular defeat.

If Coakley was emblematic of the Democratic establishment—having been groomed by the party machine to run for Ted Kennedy’s seat—Halter is presenting himself as the quintessential populist outsider, campaigning on the message that “Washington is broken” (though he himself is an alum of the Clinton administration). In announcing his candidacy, Halter railed against “bailing out Wall Street with no strings attached, while leaving middle-class Arkansas taxpayers with the bill; protecting insurance company profits instead of protecting patients.” Long frustrated with Lincoln’s centrist views and defense of corporate industry, the liberal netroots has moved quickly to embrace Halter, with MoveOn.org raising some $600,000 in the first day of his campaign—on top of $3 million the AFL-CIO has pledged to his challenge.

By teaming up with Halter, maybe Lake is just paying close attention to the numbers. She has already acknowledged that “anger is a lot more motivating than hope” in the current political and economic climate. “2010 is fast turning out to be a blame election and I think that either we are going to characterize who deserves the blame—whether that’s banks and lobbyists and people who still want to hold on to national Republican economic strategies—or we’re going to get the blame,” Lake told Politico in the wake of Coakley’s defeat.

It’s unclear whether Halter’s “candidacy of blame” has a real shot at prevailing in either the primary or the general election. Polls show him trailing even further than Lincoln in a match-up against leading GOP candidate John Boozman. But the support that Halter has already elicited from establishment Democratic operatives like Lake shows how flexible Democratic consultants can be. And while Coakley never came across as much of a fighter, perhaps Lake will have better luck with Halter, who’s already coming out swinging.

Update: As it turns out, Celinda Lake also used to be Blanche Lincoln’s pollster. That makes her jump to the Halter campaign even more of a coup for him.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate