Deem-ocrats?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Reporters mobbed House majority leader Steny Hoyer’s (D-Md.) media briefing today, firing off question after question about “deem-and-pass,” a parliamentary maneuver Dems may use to vote on the Senate health care bill and a package of “fixes” simultaneously. Republicans and the press have described the procedure as allowing Democrats to pass health care reform without voting on it—as I left Hoyer’s briefing, the chyron on MSNBC read “No Votes Needed?”—but that’s misleading.

In any case, “real Americans” don’t care about “process” issues like deem-and-pass, Hoyer argued. “In the final analysis, what is interesting to the American public is what we do for them,” Hoyer said. He defended deem-and-pass as “consistent with the rules” and “consistent with former practice,” and he’s right on that front: Republicans set new records for using the procedure when they last controlled the House. That makes the GOP “hypocritical at best” for criticizing Democrats on this front, Hoyer said.

But the criticism of the maneuver isn’t coming just from Republicans. Left-leaning commentators—including The New Republic‘s Jon Chait, the Washington Post‘s Ezra Klein, and our own Kevin Drum—have also slammed the idea, mostly because they believe it’s bad politics for the Dems. Interestingly, Hoyer left open the possibility of using a different procedure to pass the bill. He interrupted himself in the middle of defending “deem and pass” to clarify that his caucus hasn’t settled on using it. “We haven’t decided on a process at this point in time,” he said. “That’s being debated, what process we want to pursue.” Indeed.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate