Dems’ Immigration Plan: Coming Soon?

WikiMedia Commons / <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NLN_Chuck_Schumer.jpg">Thomas Good</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The immigration reform effort was dealt a big blow last weekend when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who’d been collaborating with Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on a bipartisan bill, threatened to abandon the effort entirely unless climate and energy legislation moved ahead first. It’s not yet clear what Graham’s stance actually means. But Schumer and other leading Senate Democrats are forging ahead with or without Graham, in keeping with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s desire to accelerate the reform timetable and bring a bill directly to the floor. According to policy experts and advocates familiar with the state of play, Schumer and other Democrats are presently drafting a framework for immigration reform—an outline that is intended to be the precursor to a bipartisan bill.

“It’s an attempt to open things up a bit, to encourage people who might not be ready to go all the way but who are ready to signal quiet support for doing things and give them a vehicle for doing that,” one Washington immigration advocate says. Other experts say they’ve heard of similar movement by top Democrats. “I expect the Democrats will introduce something, not necessarily a bill,” says Angela Kelley, vice-president for immigration policy and advocacy at the Center for American Progress. “Democrats need to say where they stand on this…if they’re smart, they would put something out that invites the Republicans to the table.” According to immigration advocates, the new outline for a reform bill is expected to adhere closely to the bipartisan measure that Schumer and Graham had been previously working on—which includes provisions for tightened border security, a guest-worker program, biometric identity cards, and a pathway to legalization.

In the meantime, Senate Democrats are staying mum about the reports of progress. A spokesperson for Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Afshin Mohamadi, declined to say whether the New Jersey lawmaker—the only Hispanic senator and a party leader on immigration issues—and his colleagues are resuming their efforts to push forward with immigration. “Things are very fluid in regards to the immigration issue. We’re not to say anything publicly at this point,” Mohamadi says. Reid spokesman Jim Manley says that he’d “defer to Senator Schumer,” whose office did not respond to a request for comment.

In light of the passage of Arizona’s draconian immigration law, advocates have been ramping up the pressure on the Democratic leadership to demonstrate some concrete sign of progress by May 1, when nationwide immigration reform rallies are scheduled. They say they won’t be satisfied until they see a more detailed plan from the leadership but seem encouraged by the reports of progress. “Schumer is still interested in pushing forward with this despite Graham’s concerns about moving forward with immigration reform,” says Greg Chen, director of advocacy for the American Immigration Lawyers Association. “The Dems will likely come forward with something even if they do not have Republican support at this point.” The Washington immigration advocate adds, “They want to show Harry Reid they’re ready to get something to the floor.”

Though Democrats appear to be picking up the pace on immigration reform despite Graham’s about-face, they need Republican support if they’re serious about passing a bill—a political reality that even the most vocal immigration reform supporters acknowledge. “Getting out of the gate, it doesn’t have to have a Republican on there, but they need to continue to work to have Republicans on,” says Chen. Of course, the big question is whether this framework is a serious and genuine attempt to move ahead with immigration legislation—or merely a political play designed to win Hispanic votes for Democrats in the upcoming congressional elections.

Fact:

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and billionaires wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2024 demands.

payment methods

Fact:

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2024 demands.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate