The USS Nicholas and Somali Pirates

Via <a href="http://www.nicholas.navy.mil/default.aspx">nicholas.navy.mil</a>.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Thursday morning, some “suspected” Somali pirates made a very big mistake. They fired on a large-ish ship they hoped to hijack. Unfortunately for the would-be ransom collectors, the ship was the USS Nicholas (no relation), a very well-armed American guided missile frigate. Oops! More:

The USS Nicholas returned fire on the pirate skiff, sinking it and confiscating a nearby mothership. The Navy took five pirates into custody, said Navy Lt. Patrick Foughty, a spokesman….

“If you think of the kind of young men who are doing this, they go out into the middle of the ocean in a tiny boat. They might not always make rational decisions, and they often attack things that are bigger than they should (attack),” said [Roger Middleton, a piracy expert at the British think tank Chatham House.]

I get the point Middleton was trying to make, but have you seen a photo of the USS Nicholas? (You have! It’s to the left.) That just doesn’t look like the kind of ship you want to mess with.

Anyway, if you’re interested in Somali pirate-related content, you’ve come to the right place. We’ve written about the pirates as environmental avengers, told you what Somali rapper K’naan thinks about them, explained why you can blame George Bush for them, and told you how they could help Barack Obama. We’ve also reviewed a book on pirate finance, explained what really motivates the Somali pirates, reported on the Somali pirates’ PR people, told you about pirate “consultants”, introduced you to America’s piracy point man, and much more.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate