Wall St. Reform’s Final Bout, Revolving Door Edition

WDCPIX.COM/Lauren Victoria Burke

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The fate of Congress’ massive financial reform overhaul now rests in the hands of a few select lawmakers—top Democrats and Republicans from the House and Senate. Starting Thursday, this small group has two weeks or so to merge 3,000 pages of dense, overlapping legislative text into a single bill to deliver to President Obama.

These same lawmakers also happen to be among the most well-connected to Wall Street, big banks, and their lobbyists in Washington—that is, the very industries they’re seeking to regulate. A review by Mother Jones of lobbying records shows there are 70 current or former financial lobbyists who’ve previously worked in the Capitol Hill offices of these lawmakers. The lawmakers participating in the conference process with the most Hill staffers-turned-finance-lobbyists include Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), the banking committee chairman; Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), banking committee’s ranking member; and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), a longtime ally of Wall Street.

The close ties between the financial reform conferees and finance lobbyists are a stark reminder of how much clout Wall Street has here in Washington, and how ingrained the big banks are in the legislative process. A recent report (pdf) by the Public Accountability Initiative, titled “Big Bank Takeover,” put it this way: “The big banks have employed an unrivaled network of in-house lobbying teams, hired guns, industry associations, front groups, and behind-the-scenes influence peddlers with deep connections to Congress and the Obama administration, including the leadership of the House financial services committee, the Senate banking committee, the Treasury Department, and key regulatory agencies.”

31 House members (10 of those will only participate on select parts of the bill) and 12 Senators will be participating in the financial reform conference debates, led by the House and Senate’s respective stewards of financial reform in 2009 and 2010: Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the financial services committee, and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the banking committee. 

Here’s a list of the House and Senate conferees and the number of former staffers they have who once lobbied or continue to lobby for the finance, insurance, and real estate, or FIRE, sector. All data comes from the Center for Responsive Politics’ revolving door database.

Among the Senate conferees, there are 44 former staffers with FIRE sector lobbying ties—or nearly four for each Senate conferee:

Chris Dodd (D-Conn.): 6
Richard Shelby (R-Ala.): 9
Tim Johnson (D-ND): 2
Charles Schumer (D-NY): 7
Jack Reed (D-RI): 3
Bob Corker (R-Tenn.): 1
Mike Crapo (R-Id.): 4
Judd Gregg (R-NH): 2
Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.): 5
Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.): 1
Pat Leahy (D-Vt.): 4
Tom Harkin (D-Ia.): 0

On the House side, there are 26 former staffers with FIRE ties:

Barney Frank (D-Mass.): 2
Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.): 2
Maxine Waters (D-Calif.): 1
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY): 2
Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) 0
Mel Watt (D-NC): 1
Gregory Meeks (D-NY): 2
Dennis Moore (D-Kan.): 1
Mary Jo Kilroy (D-Ohio): 0
Gary Peters (D-Mich): 0
Collin Peterson (D-Minn.): 0
Leonard Boswell (D-Iowa): 1
Henry Waxman (D-Calif.): 1
Bobby Rush (D-Ill.): 1
John Conyers (D-Mich.): 1
Howard Berman (D-Calif.): 1
Edolphus Towns (D-NY): 2
Elijah Cummings (D-Md.): 1
Nydia Velazquez (D-NY): 0
Heath Shuler (D-NC): 0
Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.): 1
Joe Barton (R-Tx.): 1
Sam Graves (R-Mo.): 1
Darrell Issa (R-Calif.): 2
Frank Lucas (R-Okla.): 0
Lamar Smith (R-Tx.): 3
Ed Royce (R-Calif.): 0
Judy Biggert (R-Ill.): 0
Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV): 0
Jeb Hensarling (R-Tx.): 0
Scott Garrett (R-NJ): 0

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate