DADT Vote Coming Next Week (Thanks Lady Gaga!)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday pledged a vote on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the controversial policy barring gays from serving openly in the military, as early as next week.

Maybe it was Lady Gaga’s Tweet earlier today urging fans to call the senator and demand a vote that finally forced the issue. I’d guess that wasn’t the deciding factor though, as DADT has been on the agenda for some time now and was moved slightly higher last week after a court threw out the ban. But Reid replied to Gaga via Twitter that a vote is coming next week. “Anyone qualified to serve this country should be allowed to do so,” Reid said. (He also urged her to “Come back to Vegas soon!”)

Reid said in a more formal statement that a measure to repeal the 17-year-old policy would be included in the Defense Authorization bill. “We will finally send a loud and clear message that everyone who steps up to serve our country should and will be welcomed regardless of sexual orientation,” said Reid.

Senate removal of the ban would also take some of the pressure off the Obama administration on the issue. While Obama has pledged to end the policy, his administration has defended it in court on the argument that Congress should determine military policy. A federal judge ruled last week that the policy violates service members’ Fifth Amendment rights to due process and First Amendment rights to free speech.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate