Fun With Google’s Ngram Viewer

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When I first heard about Google’s new Ngram viewer, I thought: Good God, when did the Scientologists get a hold of the search-engine monopoly? What’s next, online e-meters?!

Fortunately, our inestimable blogging machine, Kevin Drum, set me straight. Google’s new gadget—named for a generic measure of character-string length—gauges the popularity of selected terms over time, based on their frequency in the 5.2 million-strong book collection on Google Books. And Kevin promptly put it to good use, proving how “data is” has grown acceptable as an alternative to “data are.” (I’m with you, K., though I’ll probably have my American Copy Editors Society card yanked for admitting it.)

Kevin’s also got the right idea, treating this thing as it should be treated: a fun toy. I’m sure some journalists and academics will flock to it as a source for trend stories and testable hypotheses, and that’s just fine. But it’s of limited scientific utility just now. That, of course, will change as the cloud finds new ways to mash up the Google Labs technology. Until then, here’s a comparison of the frequency with which we’ve referred to “global thermonuclear war” and “red fire engine” since 1920:

It’s red fire engines by a mile.

And if you’ve always wondered who’s been written about more since 1998—academic postmodernists, or Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden—here’s your answer:

Don’t look now, Saddam: Foucault and Derrida just drank your milkshake.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate