Accepting a Tamed Wilderness

<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d5/Field.jpg">Petritap</a>/Wikimedia

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Rambunctious Garden
Emma Marris
Bloomsbury

Imagine an untouched stream. If you’re picturing a tortuous channel with high banks, environmental journalist Emma Marris will tell you how wrong you are. Almost everything we think of as natural has been altered by humans, she argues. In the case of the winding stream, the high banks are probably a relic from seventeenth century mill dams, and we have only come to think of them as natural over centuries of environmental amnesia. Marris insists that if nature is impure, this calls for a new approach to conservation.

For her manifesto out this week from Bloomsbury, Rambunctious Garden, Marris trots from Hawaii to Yellowstone National Park to Poland in search of fresh conservation styles. Each spot illustrates a different set of environmental priorities, and Marris uses them to prove one of her central points: that wildly different ecosystem management styles can exist on the same planet. In fact, we need to try strategy we can think of in order to find out what works.

Deep in tourist-tamed Yellowstone, Marris complicates our ideas about preserved wilderness: She finds a park visitor “devouring nature as he polished off a Dairy Queen blizzard. Welcome to Yellowstone, the wildest place in the lower forty-eight.” In wry and vivid descriptions, Marris gives her readers a laugh while grounding her abstract arguments. She shows us how even our paragons of wilderness are tempered by tourists.

Marris also reveals the literary roots of our stubborn ideas about the wild. Henry David Thoreau taught us to make a distinction between city and wilderness from his outpost beside Walden Pond. The problem is, we’ve taken the dichotomy too far. Now, we miss the forest for the trees. Or rather, we miss the urban wilderness for our too-perfect ideas about pristine nature. Contrary to our ideal, it is possible to see nature in our biggest metropolises, “bees whizzing down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan,” if we pay close enough attention.

Jetting to Europe, Marris tours her readers through Bialowieza Forest, a former hunting ground in the 15th century that straddles the Polish and Belgian border. This European Eden shows how managed parks can have an all-too-human history. In World War I, the 580-square-miles of forest swapped hands from Russia to German politician Hermann Goring, who “took it over as his own personal playground.” It came at a high cost, too. He expelled the local villagers in the forest and ordered large numbers of them murdered. “Their corpses were left inside the woods.” Marris uses all her examples to drive her ultimate point: “Our fingerprints are everywhere.”

But Marris doesn’t just dwell in the imperfections of the past. She also offers forward-looking innovations. However, the “novel ecosystems” she extolls are only possible when we broaden our definition of nature to include human interference. In Hawaii, Marris traipses the Big Island’s jungles with an ecology grad student to show us how formerly evil “invasive” plant species can be harmless. There, Marris and the student find “barrels, wire, car parts, and whole burned-out cars,” but they still see the ecosystem as salvageable. They also welcome Australian ironwood, Indian sword ferns, and American trumpet trees—invaders that work together to make a lush ecosystem. “The idea that a bunch of random plants from hither and yon could convincingly impersonate a real ecosystem rather than collapse into species-poor and poorly functioning wastelands has been markedly hard to swallow.”

To help old-school ecologists swallow Marris’ controversial ecosystems, her book borders on repetitive. But her examples drive her point home: No longer should we strive for the impossible ideal of restoring a pristine wilderness. Instead, conservationists should take a grab-bag approach: throw in assisted migration with a touch of park management and urban gardening. “There is no one best goal.” In short, there’s no way to restore an untouched earth, so let’s start touching it in the right ways.

Rambunctious Garden will be released on August 30 by Bloomsbury USA.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate