Meet the US Army’s Soldier of the Year, a Nepalese Immigrant

Sgt. Saral Shrestha accepts his Soldier of the Year award<a href="http://www.army.mil/article/89721/2012_NCO__Soldier_of_Year_named/">US Army</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The US Army named its soldier of the year on Monday. He’s a special forces-connected sergeant, an officer-in-training, an Afghanistan vet… and a recent immigrant to the United States from Nepal.

Sgt. Saral Shrestha, a native of Kathmandu, came to America in 2007 and enlisted in the Army in 2009; according to his parents, he came on a student visa but was granted US citizenship in an Army naturalization ceremony. He currently serves as a power-generator technician with the 3rd Special Forces Group, supporting their missions overseas, and reportedly tore up the stiff competition for the service’s coveted prize. 

“The competition included urban warfare simulations, board interviews, physical fitness tests, written exams, and battle drills simulating what soldiers would encounter in combat,” the local Ft. Bragg newspaper reports. That probably wasn’t hard for Shrestha, who’d already deployed to the Afghan war zone and plans to take an officer’s commission after he finishes a master’s degree. (As motivation, Shrestha cited his great grandfather, who served in the British Army during World War II. “I heard his stories when I was growing up and I guess that inspired me to some extent,” he told the Republica, a Nepali daily newspaper.)

Frankly, this isn’t a hugely remarkable development as far as the military is concerned; between 9/11 and 2011, the armed forces naturalized close to 75,000 foreign-born service members. But both the Republicans and Democrats have tacked right on immigration of late, and (depending on which day you ask him) Mitt Romney has opposed a DREAM Act-style path to citizenship, even for service members. (It’s hard to “self-deport” when you’re sitting behind the wire on an Afghan forward operating base.)

Obviously, Shrestha’s case is a little different: He came to the US and enlisted in the service on an approved visa, while the proposals for a military DREAM Act would offer a path to citizenship for undocumented foreign-born service members. But the principle remains the same: If you prove your commitment to the United States, you deserve the benefits conferred to US citizens.

That shouldn’t be controversial. What should be controversial is that, even for military DREAM Act proponents, young undocumented immigrants have to prove their worth in a way most American-born kidsor presidential candidates—don’t.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate