Business Leaders to Washington: Tax The Rich!

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com">Africa Studio</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Not to be outdone by the pack of millionaires who swept through the nation’s capital this week demanding higher taxes on the rich, two groups of business leaders are asking lawmakers for the same—because they didn’t build that.

The American Sustainable Business Council and Business for Shared Prosperity, which represent hundreds of thousands of entrepreneurs, investors, and managers—people John Boehner had claimed would be hurt by higher individual tax rates—made their case to Congress in a letter. They are urging Congress to let the Bush tax cuts expire on incomes exceeding $250,000 and to “put that money toward programs that help the economy and business.”

Signed by some 600 business owners and executives, the letter explains that it’s not pretty when you starve the beast:

The large and growing budget cuts approved by Congress and supported by the President have had a severe impact on business, particularly micro and small business and job creation—reducing funding for infrastructure improvements, community economic development programs, housing, job training, and much more. America’s failing infrastructure is starved of funds and falling further behind our global competitors’. These cuts have hurt America’s small- and medium-sized businesses and our communities.

One of the signatories, Rhiza Labs‘ president and CEO Josh Knauer, piled on in a statement: “My business would be hurt far more by allowing the tax cuts for America’s most fortunate to continue and instead slashing budgets for things like public education, research and infrastructure to pay for them.” 

“Those who claim that tax cuts help small businesses are guilty of identity theft.”

For historical evidence of trickle-down #fail, one need only look to the six years between the 2001 Bush tax cuts and the Great Recession—employment grew just 4.8 percent during that period, versus 16.2 percent in the six years following President Clinton’s 1993 tax hike.

The groups also slam the GOP for making specious arguments on their behalf: “Those who claim that tax cuts help small businesses are guilty of identity theft.” A recent Treasury analysis found that only 2.5 percent of small-business owners would pay more if the Bush tax cuts expired on high earners. And as my colleague Adam Weinstein recently pointed out, that 2.5 percent includes quite a few wealthy executives and investment firms.

“Wall Street wheelers and dealers would get no sympathy saying that ending the high-income Bush tax cuts would hurt them,” Camille Moran, a Louisiana small-business owner and signatory to the letter, said in a statement. “So instead they pretend it would hurt Main Street small business and employment. Don’t fall for it.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate