A One-Sentence Review of “Skyfall,” The New James Bond Movie

We've come a long way since Christmas Jones.Courtesy of Columbia Pictures

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Skyfall
Columbia Pictures
142 minutes

I have an obscenely long list of graphic, expletive-riddled phrases I’ve been using to illustrate how much I enjoyed Sam Mendes‘ installment in the Daniel Craig era of Bond movies, but I’m told that this is a family-friendly website.


Now that my official review is out of the way, I’d like to share something else with you: It was written by Tim Stanley, a British historian who wrote a book about Pat Buchanan. He is a blogger for the UK paper The Telegraph, and he adores Ronald Reagan.

Last May, he authored this post (in response to seeing Skyfall‘s teaser trailer) titled, “RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness and an overdose of oestrogen“:

The rot set in with the casting of Daniel Craig. Things had been going a little haywire since the late 1980s, when the producers first caved into the non-existent popular demand for political correctness. But being the 1980s, they interpreted that to mean people would like to see beautiful ladies with big chests occasionally firing a gun (Hell, yeah!).

[…]

Connery and Moore played their parts in an age when character trumped looks and women were encouraged to find a man attractive well into his seventies…And we, the heterosexual men for whom these movies are made, could watch them and aspire to be them…Gentlemen, Bond has been stolen from us and redesigned to appeal to women…Bond has thus become violent feminine porn.

Stanley blogged a follow-up last month in which he fantasizes about punching Sigmund Freud in the face. (I say this as someone who wrote a glowing review of Battleship and thought Piranha 3D was the best movie of 2010: The immaturity here is astonishing.)

Stanley’s is an example of what I call a Costanza review: Whatever it says, do and think the exact opposite.

He is correct in one respect, though: Since Daniel “Politicians Are Shitheads” Craig assumed the starring role with Casino Royale in 2006, the Bond franchise has indeed morphed into a barely recognizable enterprise.

Just compare and contrast the present-day glory of Craig-era Bond, on full, brooding display here:

 …to the equally glorious glory of this era of Bond: For more on why Skyfall is a 007 flick for the ages, listen here, in which ThinkProgress culture blogger Alyssa Rosenberg and I break down the latest Bond movie for our weekly podcast.

Skyfall gets a wide US release on Friday, November 9. The film is rated PG-13 for intense violent sequences throughout, some sexuality, language and smoking. Click here for local showtimes and tickets.

Click here for more movie and TV features from Mother Jones.

To read more of Asawin’s reviews, click here.

To listen to the weekly movie and pop-culture podcast that Asawin co-hosts with ThinkProgress critic Alyssa Rosenberg, click here.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate