Karl Rove Claims Obama ‘Suppressed the Vote’ by Running a Negative Campaign

Karl Rove’s meltdown over the battle for Ohio made for interesting television Tuesday evening, but in spite of his poor call on the election and despite the fact that Rove’s two electioneering PACs spent $170 million almost entirely on losing candidates, the former Bush adviser isn’t letting up. He’s even got a whiteboard to argue his case! (See the above clip.)

His latest? Obama won the election “by suppressing the vote,” Rove opined Thursday on Fox News, with a straight face. This doesn’t mean armed thugs turning Republicans away from the polls, mind you. According to Rove, all one needs to do to suppress the vote is run some negative ads.

“They effectively denigrated Mitt Romney’s character, business acumen, experience,” he said. Of course, by these standards every presidential candidate since Thomas Jefferson hired a writer to smear John Adams as “mentally deranged” has “suppressed the vote.” Indeed, Rove and his colleagues at Fox News and other conservative media have been “suppressing the vote” the entire time Obama has been in office. It’s amazing Obama won in 2008 after all the Republican “vote suppression” that went on that year.

Losing is tough, but Rove has tarnished what little reputation he had prior to the election by pouring away millions of dollars on losing candidates and refusing to accept reality when it’s staring him in the face. He could learn a thing or two from Mitt Romney’s gracious concession speech and try to save what little dignity he has left.

He won’t, mind you, but he should. Because as badly as the conservative media may lie to its viewers, I suspect people like Rove lie to themselves even more.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate