Study Says Comedians Have Psychotic Personality Traits—Here’s What Some Comedians Have To Say About That

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-95544988/stock-photo-crazy-businessman-making-funny-faces.html?src=h7bbT5StQyoz6BTa0MXmSg-1-58">ollyy</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


If you’ve ever seen footage of comedian Bill Hicks taking on a heckler, you might have thought to yourself, “Wow, that was pretty psychotic.”

Well, according to a recent study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, you weren’t that far off. For the study, which is titled, “Psychotic traits in comedians,” researchers recruited 523 comedians (404 male and 119 female, most of whom were amateurs) from the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. The researchers determined that comedians scored significantly higher on four types of psychotic personality traits compared to a control group of individuals who had non-artistic jobs. The study focuses on two major categories of psychosis—bipolar disorder and schizophrenia—and examines impulsive non-conformity.

“The results of this study substantially confirmed our expectation that comedians would behave like other creative groups in showing a high level of psychotic personality traits,” the authors wrote. “They did so across all the domains sampled by the questionnaire we used, from schizoid and schizophrenic-like characteristics through to manic-depressive features.”

The 6-page report also highlights English comedian and actor Stephen Fry, who has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and attempted suicide in 2012.

However, it’s important to point out that the authors of the study aren’t saying all famous or successful comedians are automatically pathologically bipolar or pathologically schizophrenic, or even that they necessarily require treatment. In other words, labeling someone’s personality traits as in the realm of “psychotic” may sound a bit scary—but it doesn’t mean that person is a psychopath or a menace to society.

Still, some professional comedians aren’t big fans of this. According to Steve Hofstetter, a former Sports Illustrated columnist and one of most booked comic acts on the American college circuit, a large number of comedians have been taking to social media to share and mock the study in the past couple of days. “The new study claiming comedians have psychotic personality traits was written by a troll who talks to me from inside my butthole,” Adam Newman wrote, for instance. Hofstetter has a much harsher take.

“The idea that it’s a news story that comedians are rebels is the equivalent of saying it’s a news story that people who spend their lives conducting studies never get laid,” the Los Angeles-based comedian says. “And if you look at the actual results of the study, it shows that actors were not that far off from comedians at all. So this was clearly a study conducted on the hypothesis that comedians have mental problems.”

Rob Delaney, the author and stand-up comedian who was named Mitt Romney’s “Twitter nemesis” during the 2012 election, was similarly critical of the comedians-are-psychotic study—but he was significantly less pissed about it.

“My honest opinion is that piece really has no effect on me,” Delaney wrote in an email. “Plus, [the study] defangs itself when it says, ‘we’re not saying they’re the dangerous kind of psychopath,’ so really I just think it’s an attention-grabber and not actually a substantive piece of information. Do you need a psychological kink of some kind to function as a comedian, particularly one that makes a living at it? Yes. Is that kink psychosis or close to psychosis? I don’t know and I don’t really care. But perhaps that means I’m a psychopath? Maybe. I know I brutally pursue my goals regardless of whatever the hell else is happening in the world and anticipate success in all my endeavors, even when that feeling is unfounded. So that’s what I think.”

(Lewis Black, Joan Rivers, and Gallagher did not respond to requests for comment.)

So whatever the researchers’ intentions, perhaps their new report hasn’t won them any new friends in the community of stand-up comics. Hell, at least they didn’t author a study telling comedians that they were going to drop dead at a young age.

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate