The LAPD Waited How Long to Suspend 2 Cops Repeatedly Accused of Sexual Assault?!

A new lawsuit alleges that the Los Angeles Police Department tried to bury troubling allegations against its officers.

Panoramic/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Los Angeles Police Department attempted to bury a case of sexual assault involving two of its officers, even telling the victim not to seek legal counsel after she came forward, according to a recent lawsuit filed in a California federal court. The suit alleges that the officers were reported for sexual assault by at least three other women between 2009 and 2012, but they remained on the job until 2013.

In September 2009, Tara McMahon, then 20, was arrested on drug charges by LAPD narcotics officers Luis Valenzuela and James Nichols; in the following months, she alleges in a legal complaint that was filed in late March, the two officers continued to contact and harass her. Toward the end of the year, McMahon says she was walking her dog in Hollywood when Valenzuela and Nichols pulled up beside her and ordered her inside their car. Valenzuela then drove to a secluded spot, and forced McMahon to perform oral sex on him in the back of the car while Nichols sat in the front seat, the complaint alleges. “If you don’t suck my dick, you’re going to jail,” Valenzuela told McMahon, according to a search warrant filed by an investigator involved in an ongoing LA County criminal investigation of the men. The officers threatened McMahon with jail if she told anyone about the incident, according to the complaint. McMahon alleges that the officers also tried to buy her a ticket to Las Vegas, if she promised not to come back to LA.

When McMahon reported the incident to the LAPD in January 2011, the suit alleges that “she was stonewalled and strung along for nearly three years by an LAPD Internal Affairs detective who mixed false promises that the officers would be brought to justice with a repeated command: Don’t talk to a lawyer.” The complaint continues, “[Internal Affairs was] only interested in keeping her quiet and burying the case.”

Fatima Goss Graves, a vice president at the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), says McMahon’s allegations are “shocking. An allegation of this level about this sort of brutality and assault…is something that should prompt an immediate investigation…Circling wagons and closing in is not the right approach.”

Because the LAPD failed to take disciplinary action against Valenzuela and Nichols immediately after McMahon reported the incident, the two officers were allegedly able to sexually assault at least one other woman, according to the LA County search warrant. Between 2009 and 2012, a total of four women reported they had been sexually assaulted by Valenzuela and/or Nichols, the complaint says. (In January, the city of Los Angeles agreed to pay one of the alleged victims $575,000 to settle her suit against the city.) Finally, in January 2013, the two men were suspended with pay as the department investigated. Nichols’ lawyer, Robert Rico, says his client denies McMahon’s allegations. Valenzuela did not respond to a request for comment. 

Valenzuela and Nichols are currently on unpaid suspension as they await the results of a disciplinary hearing. LAPD officials have determined that there is sufficient evidence to fire them, sources told the Los Angeles Times in November, but since the chief of police does not have the authority to fire an officer, a department disciplinary panel will decide their fate. The district attorney’s office says it is reviewing the case to decide whether to file criminal charges against them.

The sexual-assault allegations against the two officers could point to a more systemic problem within the LAPD, according to Goss Graves. “Having knowledge about even one [sexual-assault] case…in a police department should raise real alarm about whether there’s a broader…abuse of authority within the department,” she says, adding that an independent investigator should be brought in to make that determination. The LAPD declined to comment, as did he office of Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti.

In recent months, other police departments around the country have faced sexual-assault allegations. In mid-March, a police officer in Baltimore was charged with raping a woman he was supposed to be helping after a traffic accident. Around the same time, police officers in Detroit and San Jose, California, were both separately charged with raping women who had called 911 during domestic-violence incidents.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate