Why Chipotle Just Banned Guns

And the truth about the gun gang that just intimidated the restaurant’s customers with assault rifles.


inside chipotle

Open Carry Texas demonstrators at Chipotle. Screenshot: Facebook

Carne asada with an assault rifle on the side? Not so much. Chipotle has now become the third food and beverage chain to explicitly ask customers not to bring loaded firearms into its stores, after a demonstration at a Dallas franchise over the weekend provoked a backlash from a leading national gun-reform group. 

On Saturday, members of the Dallas County chapter of the gun-rights activist group Open Carry Texas brought along their military-style assault rifles with their appetites for burritos. “I personally carry an AK-47,” one member told a local reporter. “There were a few AR-15s there. The rifles were loaded. There’s no reason to carry an unloaded weapon—it wouldn’t do any good.” Openly carrying rifles (but not handguns) is legal in Texas.

The mannequin used in the "mad minute." Facebook screen shot

The handiwork of Open Carry Texas. Read the full investigation here.

Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America moved swiftly with a social media campaign denouncing the stunt, which came on the heels of similar efforts focused on Starbucks, Jack in the Box, and Facebook. On Monday, Chipotle responded. “We are respectfully asking that customers not bring guns into our restaurants, unless they are authorized law enforcement personnel,” the company said in a statement. The Chipotle spokesperson noted that the demonstration in Dallas “caused many of our customers anxiety and discomfort.” 

Those Chipotle patrons had more reason to be uncomfortable than they may have realized. As I reported in an in-depth story last week, members of Open Carry Texas have harassed and bullied people who have expressed concern about their demonstrations. That harassment has included specifically targeting and degrading women, from publishing a schoolteacher’s personal information (she was soon attacked as a “stupid bitch” and “motherfucking whore”) and calling women who promote gun reforms “thugs with jugs,” to obliterating a naked female mannequin at a gun range. See the videos, images, and other disturbing details here

For that story, I spoke with the head of Open Carry Texas, CJ Grisham, who told me that he would no longer engage in the harassment of women. “I’m not going to play those childish games anymore, so you won’t catch me using ‘thugs with jugs’. I’ve moved on,” he said.

But on Saturday, as word spread that Moms Demand Action was mobilizing around the Chipotle incident, Grisham took a shot at them on the Facebook page of an Open Carry Texas colleague: The women, Grisham said, are “encouraging their fellow sycophants to call and prevent you from going in. You may want to warn the manager to expect a relentless stream of calls from cackling wenches.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate