Rubio’s All In for Nevada—and the Cards Aren’t Falling His Way

The state could be make-or-break for the top establishment GOP candidate.

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-305282492/stock-photo-welcome-to-fabulous-las-vegas-nevada-sign-with-blur-strip-road-background.html?src=VwCDin0XUL-_iJXBsszKbg-1-53">LittleStocker</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Marco Rubio is the betting markets’ top-pick to win the Republican presidential nomination, and he’s polling the best among the candidates most closely aligned with the party’s establishment. But with the first votes less than a month away in the primary contest, his campaign is in search of an early victory with which to stake his claim to that front-runner status.

“Rubio’s biggest concern is: Where do I get an early win?” says GOP strategist Ford O’Connell. “That is what is keeping them up at night.”

The answer is looking increasingly like Nevada. The problem is that Rubio’s currently trailing badly in the polls there, and his best shot at early momentum is an uphill climb.

Rubio was always unlikely to win in Iowa, where the Republican caucus-goers prefer outspoken social conservatives like Mike Huckabee (the 2008 winner) and Rick Santorum (the 2012 winner). Instead, his launching pad was generally considered to be New Hampshire, where establishment candidates like John McCain (2008) and Mitt Romney (2012) have cemented their front-runner status. But this year, despite Rubio’s strong standing among the party establishment, a New Hampshire win seems unlikely, thanks largely to the Donald Trump phenomenon.

Next comes South Carolina, where the latest poll has Rubio at 12 percent, behind Ted Cruz at 23 percent and Trump at 38 percent. That leaves the February 23 caucuses in Nevada, the final state where Rubio can lay claim to an early victory and position himself as a top contender going into Super Tuesday on March 1.

Nevada is an attractive state for Rubio for many reasons. He lived there for several years as a child, at a time when he practiced Mormonism, giving him a connection to the state’s large Mormon population as well as its sizable number of Hispanic voters. And unlike New Hampshire and South Carolina, Nevada is a caucus state—where conventional wisdom says a robust ground game can put the hardest-working candidate over the top. Rubio has built up a serious campaign operation in the Silver State, led by Mike Slanker, who ran Republican Brian Sandoval’s two winning gubernatorial campaigns and Dean Heller’s US Senate victory in 2012. Rubio’s campaign chairman is the state’s lieutenant governor, Mark Hutchison, a prominent Mormon who is helping Rubio win over that crucial group. In Nevada, Mormons represent just 4 percent of the population but are expected to make up nearly a quarter of the Republican caucus-goers next month. “We’re doing the same thing with Rubio as we’ve done to win statewide,” Hutchison told National Review Online recently. “We know what to do. We know how to win.”

Of course, other campaigns are getting the same idea. Trump and Cruz, whose campaign is ramping up its efforts in Nevada, both lead Rubio in the latest poll in the state. Polling in Nevada has been sparse, and it’s notoriously difficult to predict the outcome of caucuses with statewide polls. But the numbers in the latest survey show Rubio 22 points behind Trump and 9 points behind Cruz—hardly a front-runner position.

Cruz, who is currently the favorite to win Iowa, is banking on the heavily Southern Super Tuesday states to win the nomination—a strategy all the more likely if he wins Nevada. “Cruz wants to have two wins underneath his belt” ahead of Super Tuesday, says O’Connell. “If he can sway evangelicals away from the Trump phenomenon going into the South, he’s in much better shape.”

For months, Cruz has been talking about the federal government’s massive land holdings in the West, an issue that, as O’Connell points out, is a big deal in Nevada. And, like Rubio, he has enlisted prominent Mormons to help him win over that demographic.

Then there’s Jeb Bush, who’s looking for his chance at a comeback. Initially, his path to the nomination was supposed to begin in New Hampshire, but with the former Florida governor trailing badly there, Nevada could become Bush’s last stand if he lasts until late February. Bush’s campaign claims it has the best organization in Nevada, and that in a caucus state, organization is what matters most.

“We’ve made close to a quarter of a million contacts” with voters, says Republican strategist Ryan Erwin, a senior adviser to the Bush campaign. “In an election where turnout has never reached 50,000 for a Republican caucus, the campaign that turns out the extra four or five thousand people beyond its goal probably wins.”

And who would suffer most if Bush manages a decent showing in Nevada? The other candidate banking on the support of establishment voters: Rubio.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate